Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35414232›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2022

Costs and benefits of predator-induced defence in a toxic diatom.

Anna J Olesen, Fredrik Ryderheim, Bernd Krock, Nina Lundholm, Thomas Kiørboe

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Passive sampling for grazer cues incorporates top-down effects in harmful algal bloom monitoring and toxin prediction.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Anna J OlesenNatural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, 1353 Copenhagen K, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9001-9845
Fredrik RyderheimCentre for Ocean Life, DTU Aqua, Technical University of Denmark, Kemitorvet, Building 202, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-2346-517X
Bernd KrockAlfred Wegener Institut-Helmholtz Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung, Chemische Ökologie, Am Handelshafen 12, 27570 Bremerhaven, Germany.
Nina LundholmNatural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, 1353 Copenhagen K, Denmark.
Thomas KiørboeCentre for Ocean Life, DTU Aqua, Technical University of Denmark, Kemitorvet, Building 202, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-3265-336X
Technical University of Denmark · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DKAlfred-Wegener-Institut Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phytoplankton employ a variety of defence mechanisms against predation, including production of toxins. Domoic acid (DA) production by the diatom

Indexed as

CopepodaDiatomsAnimalsCost-Benefit AnalysisCuesPhytoplanktoncopepodsdefensive benefitdiatom defencemarine chemical interactionstrade-offs

Identifiers

PMID35414232
PMCPMC9006007
OpenAlexW4223545357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.