Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35414064›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Behavioural and neural indices of perceptual decision-making in autistic children during visual motion tasks.

Catherine Manning, Cameron D Hassall, Laurence T Hunt, Anthony M Norcia, Eric-Jan Wagenmakers, Nathan J Evans, Gaia Scerif

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. A diffusion model analysis of task set inertia and task set reconfiguration in ADHD.Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. When 2 become 1: Autistic simultaneity judgements about asynchronous audiovisual speech.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Visual Motion and Decision-Making in Dyslexia: Reduced Accumulation of Sensory Evidence and Related Neural Dynamics.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Catherine ManningDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. c.a.manning@reading.ac.uk.
Cameron D HassallDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Laurence T HuntDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Anthony M NorciaDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.
Eric-Jan WagenmakersFaculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Nathan J Evans *School of Psychology, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Gaia Scerif *Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
University of Oxford · GBStanford University · USUniversity of Amsterdam · NLUniversity of Queensland · AU

Funding

Stanford Vision Research CoreP30EY026877 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Jeffrey L Goldberg · 2017 to 2026
$8.0M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY026877Wellcome Trust 204685/Z/16/ZWellcome Trust 208789/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many studies report atypical responses to sensory information in autistic individuals, yet it is not clear which stages of processing are affected, with little consideration given to decision-making processes. We combined diffusion modelling with high-density EEG to identify which processing stages differ between 50 autistic and 50 typically developing children aged 6-14 years during two visual motion tasks. Our pre-registered hypotheses were that autistic children would show task-dependent differences in sensory evidence accumulation, alongside a more cautious decision-making style and longer non-decision time across tasks. We tested these hypotheses using hierarchical Bayesian diffusion models with a rigorous blind modelling approach, finding no conclusive evidence for our hypotheses. Using a data-driven method, we identified a response-locked centro-parietal component previously linked to the decision-making process. The build-up in this component did not consistently relate to evidence accumulation in autistic children. This suggests that the relationship between the EEG measure and diffusion-modelling is not straightforward in autistic children. Compared to a related study of children with dyslexia, motion processing differences appear less pronounced in autistic children. Exploratory analyses also suggest weak evidence that ADHD symptoms moderate perceptual decision-making in autistic children.

Indexed as

Autistic DisorderDyslexiaBayes TheoremChildDecision MakingHumans

Identifiers

PMID35414064
PMCPMC9005733
OpenAlexW4225424817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.