Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35413974›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2022

Different methods of eubiotic feed additive provision affect the health, performance, fermentation, and metabolic status of dairy calves during the preweaning period.

Barbara Stefańska, Frank Katzer, Barbara Golińska, Patrycja Sobolewska, Sebastian Smulski, Andrzej Frankiewicz, Włodzimierz Nowak

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial, Veterinary
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Effects ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Barbara StefańskaDepartment of Grassland and Natural Landscape Sciences, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Poznań, Poland. barbara.stefanska@up.poznan.pl.
Frank KatzerDepartment of Disease Control, Moredun Research Institute, Penicuik, UK.
Barbara GolińskaDepartment of Grassland and Natural Landscape Sciences, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Poznań, Poland.
Patrycja SobolewskaDepartment of Grassland and Natural Landscape Sciences, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Poznań, Poland.
Sebastian SmulskiDepartment of Internal Diseases and Diagnostics, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Poznań, Poland.
Andrzej FrankiewiczDepartment of Animal Nutrition, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Poznań, Poland.
Włodzimierz NowakDepartment of Animal Nutrition, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Poznań, Poland.
University of Life Sciences in Poznań · PLMoredun Research Institute · GB

Funding

This study was supported by grant financed by The National Centre for Research and Development: Warszawa; Poland grant no. PBS1/A8/10/2012
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to evaluate whether different methods of providing eubiotic feed additives to neonatal calves, during the preweaning period, can improve the calves' health, performance, ruminal fermentation, and metabolic status. Forty-four (3-day-old) Holstein-Friesian dairy calves (22 female and 22 male) were divided into four treatment groups for the duration of the 8-week trial. The eubiotic feed additive consisted of a combination of probiotic Lactobacillus spp. (multiple-strains at a dose of 250 mg/calf/day) and phytobiotics containing rosmarinic acid, as the main bioactive compound (at a dose of 50 mg/calf/day). The groups were named: CON (control, without eubiotic in either the milk replacer or the starter feed), MR (eubiotic in the milk replacer), SF (eubiotic in the starter feed), MRS (eubiotic in both the milk replacer and the starter feed). The individual intake of starter feed and the fecal scores were measured daily, and body weight and biometric measurements were taken weekly until calves were 56 days of age. Blood samples were collected on day 3 and then every 14 days to determine concentrations of insulin-like-growth-factor-I, β-hydroxybutyrate, non-esterified fatty acids, and blood urea nitrogen. Ruminal fluid was collected on days 28 and 56 for short-chain fatty acids, NH

resultsThe body weight of the calves of the MR treatment group was higher compared to all other groups on days 28 and 56. Including the eubiotic feed additive in the milk replacer increased average daily gain, starter intake, and total dry matter intake from day 29 to day 56 and the overall experimental period compared to the CON group. The calves with MR treatment had lower fecal scores from days 3 to 28, a number of parasite oocysts/cysts per gram of feces on day 28, and the occurrences of fecal consistency scores of 3 (mild diarrhea) and 4 (severe diarrhea) were 3.2 and 3.0 times lower, respectively, compared with the CON group. The MR group had higher ruminal concentrations of short-chain-fatty-acids, propionate, and butyrate on day 56 than the CON group. Adding eubiotics into milk replacer resulted in the highest concentrations of blood insulin-like-growth-factor-I and β-hydroxybutyrate from days 29 to 56 and the overall experimental period.

conclusionThe addition of eubiotic feed additives into the milk replacer can improve health, performance, ruminal fermentation, and biochemical blood indices in dairy calves during the preweaning period.

Indexed as

Animal FeedRumen3-Hydroxybutyric AcidAnimalsBody WeightCattleDiarrheaDietFatty Acids, VolatileFemaleFermentationInsulinMaleMilkWeaning3-Hydroxybutyric AcidFatty Acids, VolatileInsulinCalf rearingDiarrheaFeed additivePhytobioticProbioticRosmarinic acid

Identifiers

PMID35413974
PMCPMC9003169
OpenAlexW4223506852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.