Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35413897›Full record

ArticleBMC surgery2022

Efficacy comparison of trifocal bone transport using unilateral external fixator for femoral and tibial bone defects caused by infection.

Kai Liu, Yanshi Liu, Feiyu Cai, Chenchen Fan, Peng Ren, Aihemaitijiang Yusufu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kai Liu *Department of Trauma and Microreconstructive Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Ürümqi, 830054, Xinjiang, China.
Yanshi Liu *Department of Trauma and Microreconstructive Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Ürümqi, 830054, Xinjiang, China.
Feiyu CaiDepartment of Trauma and Microreconstructive Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Ürümqi, 830054, Xinjiang, China.
Chenchen FanDepartment of Trauma and Microreconstructive Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Ürümqi, 830054, Xinjiang, China.
Peng RenDepartment of Trauma and Microreconstructive Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Ürümqi, 830054, Xinjiang, China. rpsky@126.com.
Aihemaitijiang YusufuDepartment of Trauma and Microreconstructive Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Ürümqi, 830054, Xinjiang, China. ahmatjang@163.com.
First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University · CNXinjiang Medical University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China NO. 81560357Natural Science Foundation of Xinjiang NO.2020D01C250
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to evaluate the clinical and functional outcomes of patients with femoral and tibial critical-sized bone defect (CSBD) treated by trifocal bone transport using the Ilizarov method.

methodsFrom March 2011 and January 2017, clinical and radiographic data of patients with CSBD (> 6 cm) caused by infection were documented and analyzed. Patients were divided into the femur group (n = 18) and tibia groups (n = 21) according to the location of bone transport. The bone and functional outcomes were evaluated according to the Association for the Study and Application of the Method of the Ilizarov (ASAMI) criterion, and postoperative complications were evaluated by Paley classification.

resultsA total of 39 patients were managed by the trifocal bone transport for the femur (n = 18) or tibia (n = 21) bone defects with a mean follow-up time of 26.1 months (range 17-34 months). Eighteen femurs and 21 tibias with a mean distraction regenerate length (DRL) of 8.3 cm (range 6-13 cm) and 7.5 cm (range 6-11 cm) respectively. Infection was eradicated in all patients, and the total bone union was received in all cases (100%). Statistical difference of bone grade (excellent/good/fair/poor, 3/11/3/1 vs 2/13/4/2, P < 0.05), and function grade (excellent/good/fair/poor, 3/14/1/0 vs 4/13/3/1, P < 0.05) were respectively observed between the femur group and tibia group. The excellent and good rate of bone (femur vs tibia, 77.8% vs 71.4%), and function grade (femur vs tibia, 94.4% vs 80.9%) was higher in the femur group than the tibia. The rate of complication in the femur group was lower than in the tibia (femur vs tibia, 94.4% vs 76.2%). One femur and five tibias were performed additional surgery for delayed union and axial deviation.

conclusionsThe trifocal bone transport using the unilateral external fixator was a practical method in the management of CSBD in the lower extremity. The BUT and EFI of the femur group were shorter than the tibia. Although the complications noted were more frequent on the femur, these were mostly minor.

Indexed as

Ilizarov TechniqueTibial FracturesExternal FixatorsFemurHumansLower ExtremityRetrospective StudiesTibiaTreatment OutcomeBone defectBone transportExternal fixatorIlizarov methodInfection

Identifiers

PMID35413897
PMCPMC9004006
OpenAlexW4223442637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.