Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35413892›Full record

ArticleBMC pediatrics2022

The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire Parent Form: Dutch norms and validity.

Meinou H C Theunissen, Marianne S de Wolff, Iris Eekhout, Cathelijne L Mieloo, Lisanne L Stone, Sijmen A Reijneveld

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Meinou H C TheunissenTNO Child Health, P. O. Box 3005, Leiden, 2301 DA, the Netherlands. Meinou.Theunissen@tno.nl.
Marianne S de WolffTNO Child Health, P. O. Box 3005, Leiden, 2301 DA, the Netherlands.
Iris EekhoutTNO Child Health, P. O. Box 3005, Leiden, 2301 DA, the Netherlands.
Cathelijne L MielooThe Hague University of Applied Sciences, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Lisanne L StoneKarakter, Child and Adolescent Psychiatry University Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Sijmen A ReijneveldTNO Child Health, P. O. Box 3005, Leiden, 2301 DA, the Netherlands.
Dutch Expert Centre for Screening · NLThe Hague University of Applied Sciences · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study provides Dutch national norms for the parent-reported Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) for children aged 3-14 years, and assesses the test performance of the SDQ Total Difficulties Scale (TDS) and impairment Scale. We further compared Dutch SDQ norms with those of the United Kingdom (UK), to determine potential variation in country-specific norms. STUDY

designWe analyzed data of 3384 children aged 3 to 14 years. The data were obtained in schools, and in the context of Preventive Child Healthcare. Parents completed the SDQ parent form and the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL). We determined clinical (10% elevated scores) and borderline (20% elevated scores) SDQ TDS norms. We assessed the test performance (validity) of the SDQ TDS and Impairment Score using the CBCL as criterion.

resultsThe clinical SDQ TDS norms varied between > 10 and > 14 depending on the age group. The SDQ TDS discriminated between children with and without problems, as measured by the CBCL, for all age groups (AUCs varied from 0.92 to 0.96). The SDQ Impairment Score had added value (beyond the SDQ TDS) only for the age group 12-14 years. For the Netherlands we found lower clinical SDQ TDS norms than those previously reported for the UK (i.e. > 16).

conclusionThe clinical SDQ TDS norms varied between > 10 and > 14 depending on the age groups. We found good test performance at these proposed norms. Dutch norms differed somewhat from UK norms. In the Netherlands, the SDQ performed better with Dutch-specific norms than with UK-specific norms.

Indexed as

Child Behavior DisordersAdolescentChildHumansParentsPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesChildrenCommunity pediatric servicesEmotional and behavioral problemsNormsSDQ

Identifiers

PMID35413892
PMCPMC9004049
OpenAlexW4223519805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.