Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35413889›Full record

ReviewJournal of cannabis research2022

Patient caught breastfeeding and instructed to stop: an empirical ethics study on marijuana and lactation.

Marielle S Gross, Margot Le Neveu, Kara A Milliken, Mary Catherine Beach

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cannabis research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Marielle S GrossDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive, Sciences, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Magee Women's Hospital, 300 Halket St, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Margot Le NeveuDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins Hospital, 1800 Orleans St, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
Kara A MillikenDavid S. Olton Behavioral Biology Program, Zanvyl Krieger School of Arts and Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 N Charles St, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA. kmillik1@jh.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4027-7149
Mary Catherine BeachJohns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics, 1809 Ashland, Ave, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics · USJohns Hopkins Hospital · USJohns Hopkins University · USMagee-Womens Hospital · US

Funding

Robert Wood Johnson Foundation 75750
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe US guidelines recommend avoiding marijuana during breastfeeding given concerns about infant's neurodevelopment. In this setting, some physicians and hospitals recommend against or prohibit breastfeeding when marijuana use is detected during pregnancy. However, breastfeeding is beneficial for infants and women, and stigmatization of substance use in pregnancy has been historically linked to punitive approaches with a disproportionate impact on minority populations. We advance an empirically informed ethical analysis of this issue.

methodsFirst, we performed a retrospective cross-sectional qualitative study of prenatal and postpartum records from a random sample of 150 women delivered in an academic hospital system in 2017 to provide evidence and context regarding breastfeeding management in relation to marijuana use. We then perform a scoping literature review on infant risks from breastmilk marijuana exposure and risks associated with not breastfeeding for infants and women. Finally, we analyze this issue vis-a-vis ethical principles of beneficence, autonomy, and justice.

results(1) Medical records reveal punitive language pertaining to the medicinal use of marijuana in pregnancy and misinterpretation of national guidelines, e.g., "patient caught breastfeeding and instructed to stop." (2) Though there are plausible neurodevelopmental harms from breastmilk exposure to THC, evidence of infant effects from breastmilk exposure to marijuana is limited and largely confounded by concomitant pregnancy exposure and undisclosed exposures. By contrast, health benefits of breastfeeding for women and infants are well-established, as are harms of forgoing breastfeeding. (3) Discouraging breastfeeding for women with marijuana use in pregnancy contradicts beneficence, as it neglects women's health considerations and incorrectly assumes that risks exceed benefits for infants. Restrictive hospital practices (e.g., withholding lactation support) compromise maternal autonomy and exploit power asymmetry between birthing persons and institutions, particularly when compulsory toxicology screening prompts child welfare investigations. Finally, recommending against breastfeeding during prenatal care and imposing restrictions during postpartum hospitalization may exacerbate racial disparities in breastfeeding and related health outcomes.

conclusionsPolicy interpretations which discourage rather than encourage breastfeeding among women who use of marijuana may cause net harm, compromise autonomy, and disproportionately threaten health and wellbeing of underserved women and infants.

Indexed as

BreastfeedingCannabisHospital policyMarijuanaStigma

Identifiers

PMID35413889
PMCPMC9003965
OpenAlexW4223427070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.