Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35413885›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2022

Sensitivity of Haemonchus contortus to anthelmintics using different in vitro screening assays: a comparative study.

Beatriz Munguía, Jenny Saldaña, Magdalena Nieves, María Elisa Melian, Manuela Ferrer, Ramiro Teixeira, Williams Porcal, Eduardo Manta, Laura Domínguez

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Journal of advanced veterinary and animal research · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Beatriz MunguíaÁrea de Farmacología, CIENFAR, Facultad de Química, Universidad de la República (Udelar), Montevideo, Uruguay.
Jenny SaldañaÁrea de Farmacología, CIENFAR, Facultad de Química, Universidad de la República (Udelar), Montevideo, Uruguay.
Magdalena NievesÁrea de Farmacología, CIENFAR, Facultad de Química, Universidad de la República (Udelar), Montevideo, Uruguay.
María Elisa MelianÁrea de Farmacología, CIENFAR, Facultad de Química, Universidad de la República (Udelar), Montevideo, Uruguay.
Manuela FerrerÁrea de Farmacología, CIENFAR, Facultad de Química, Universidad de la República (Udelar), Montevideo, Uruguay.
Ramiro TeixeiraÁrea de Farmacología, CIENFAR, Facultad de Química, Universidad de la República (Udelar), Montevideo, Uruguay.
Williams PorcalDepartamento de Química Orgánica, Facultad de Química, Universidad de la República (Udelar), Montevideo, Uruguay.
Eduardo MantaDepartamento de Química Orgánica, Facultad de Química, Laboratorio de Química Farmacéutica, Universidad de la República (Udelar), Montevideo, Uruguay.
Laura DomínguezÁrea de Farmacología, CIENFAR, Facultad de Química, Universidad de la República (Udelar), Montevideo, Uruguay. ldoming@fq.edu.uy.
Universidad de la República · UY

Funding

ANII ANII_PR_FSA_1_2013_1_12443ANII FMV_1_2017_1_136597
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHelminthiasis and resistance to commercial anthelmintic compounds are major causes of economic losses for livestock producers, resulting in an urgent need for new drugs and reliable in vitro screening tests capable of detecting potentially active products. Considering this, a series of novel benzimidazole derivatives (5-methylbenzimidazole 1,2-disubstituted, 5-carboxybenzimidazole, 5-methylbenzimidazole 2-one) was screened on exsheathed L3 (xL3) and on the adult stage of Haemonchus contortus (Kirby anthelmintic-susceptible McMaster isolate).

methodsThis work presents the set-up of an automated motility assay on the xL3 stage of H. contortus using an infrared tracking device (WMicrotracker One) together with a larval development test (xL3 to L4) and a motility assay on the adult stage of H. contortus. A comparative study of the sensitivity of these in vitro assays using commercial anthelmintics with different mechanisms of action was carried out, also evaluating anthelmintic activity of a series of novel benzimidazole derivatives.

resultsThe automated xL3 assay had the great advantage of being able to analyze many compounds simultaneously, but it showed the limitation of having lower sensitivity, requiring higher concentrations of the commercial anthelmintics tested compared to those needed for the adult motility or development assays. Although none of the novel 1,2,5-tri-substituted benzimidazole derivatives could significantly decrease the motility of xL3s, one of them (1e) significantly affected the development of xL3s to L4, and five new compounds (1b, 1d, 1e, 2a and 2c) reduced the motility of H. contortus adult stage.

conclusionsThe analysis of the results strongly suggests that the in vitro xL3 to L4 development test, particularly for the L4 stage, could be closer to the pharmacological sensitivity of the adult stage of H. contortus (target of interest) for commercial anthelmintic selected, with different mechanisms of action, and for the series of benzimidazole derivatives assayed. Therefore, an automated motility assay on L4 using the infrared tracking device is being set up. Further studies will be conducted to evaluate the in vivo anthelmintic activity of the most active novel benzimidazole derivatives.

Indexed as

AnthelminticsHaemonchusAnimalsAntinematodal AgentsBiological AssayIn Vitro TechniquesLarvaAnthelminticsAntinematodal AgentsAnthelmintic screeningAutomated motility assayBenzimidazole derivativesDevelopment assayHaemonchus contortusNew anthelmintics

Identifiers

PMID35413885
PMCPMC9006605
OpenAlexW4223527601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.