Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35413866›Full record

ArticleTrials2022

Within-subject effects of standardized prosthetic socket modifications on physical function and patient-reported outcomes.

William Anderst, Goeran Fiedler, Kentaro Onishi, Gina McKernan, Tom Gale, Paige Paulus

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05041998 (Improving Physical Function and Patient-reported Outcomes Through a Quantitatively-informed Socket Design Process), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05041998 nacompletednot on this map

Improving Physical Function and Patient-reported Outcomes Through a Quantitatively-informed Socket Design Process

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PittsburghRan2021 to 2025Enrolled8ConditionsArtificial LimbsArmsTrans-femoral prosthetic socket
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

William AnderstDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA.
Goeran FiedlerDepartment of Rehabilitation Science and Technology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA. gfiedler@pitt.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1532-1248
Kentaro OnishiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA.
Gina McKernanHuman Engineering Research Laboratory, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA.
Tom GaleDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA.
Paige PaulusDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA.
University of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

U.S. Department of Defense W81XWH2010914
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAmong the challenges of living with lower limb loss is the increased risk of long-term health problems that can be either attributed directly to the amputation surgery and/or prosthetic rehabilitation or indirectly to a disability-induced sedentary lifestyle. These problems are exacerbated by poorly fit prosthetic sockets. There is a knowledge gap regarding how the socket design affects in-socket mechanics and how in-socket mechanics affect patient-reported comfort and function. The objectives of this study are (1) to gain a better understanding of how in-socket mechanics of the residual limb in transfemoral amputees are related to patient-reported comfort and function, (2) to identify clinical tests that can streamline the socket design process, and (3) to evaluate the efficacy and cost of a novel, quantitatively informed socket optimization process.

methodsUsers of transfemoral prostheses will be asked to walk on a treadmill wearing their current socket plus 8 different check sockets with designed changes in different structural measurements that are likely to induce changes in residual limb motion, skin strain, and pressure distribution within the socket. Dynamic biplane radiography and pressure sensors will be used to measure in-socket residual limb mechanics. Patient-reported outcomes will also be collected after wearing each socket. The effects of in-socket mechanics on both physical function and patient-reported outcomes (aim 1) will be assessed using a generalized linear model. Partial correlation analysis will be used to examine the association between research-grade measurements and readily available clinical measurements (aim 2). In order to compare the new quantitative design method to the standard of care, patient-reported outcomes and cost will be compared between the two methods, utilizing the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney non-parametric test (aim 3). DISCUSSION: Knowledge on how prosthetic socket modifications affect residual bone and skin biomechanics itself can be applied to devise future socket designs, and the methodology can be used to investigate and improve such designs, past and present. Apart from saving time and costs, this may result in better prosthetic socket fit for a large patient population, thus increasing their mobility, participation, and overall health-related quality of life.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05041998 . Date of registration: Sept 13, 2021.

Indexed as

AmputeesArtificial LimbsHumansPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresProsthesis DesignQuality of LifeDynamic radiographyLimb prostheticsMotion analysisRandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID35413866
PMCPMC9006565
OpenAlexW4223418749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.