ArticleBMC bioinformatics2022
A comparison of topologically associating domain callers over mammals at high resolution.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- Systematic evaluation of the heterogeneity of topologically associating domain boundaries in a large genomic context in humans.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Integrating heterogeneity into topologically associating domain boundary prediction in large genomic context in human.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026Article
- A comparative analysis of topological domain callers over RNA-associated interactome.BMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Conserved 3D genome reorganization during DNA repair.Life science alliance · 2026Review
- A wavelet-based approach generates quantitative, scale-free and hierarchical descriptions of 3D genome structures and new biological insights.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Analysis of chromatin structure reveals the connection between sQTLs and the splicing of distant genes.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- EmbedTAD Using Graph Embedding and Unsupervised Learning to Identify TADs from High-Resolution Hi-C Data.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Analysis of long-range contacts across cell types outlines a core sequence determinant of 3D genome organization.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Accurate and robust 3D genome feature discovery from multiplexed DNA FISH.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Chrombus-XMBD: a graph convolution model predicting 3D-genome from chromatin features.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Motif distribution in genomes gives insights into gene clustering and co-regulation.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- HTAD: a human-in-the-loop framework for supervised chromatin domain detection.Genome biology · 2024Article
- The chromatin tapestry as a framework for neurodevelopment.Genome research · 2024Review
- Identifying topologically associating domains using differential kernels.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- The scales, mechanisms, and dynamics of the genome architecture.Science advances · 2024Review
- Improving Hi-C contact matrices using genome graphs.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- The shape of chromatin: insights from computational recognition of geometric patterns in Hi-C data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2023Review
- The 3D chromatin landscape of rhabdomyosarcoma.NAR cancer · 2023Article
- Mapping robust multiscale communities in chromosome contact networks.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Mapping the semi-nested community structure of 3D chromosome contact networks.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTopologically associating domains (TADs) are locally highly-interacting genome regions, which also play a critical role in regulating gene expression in the cell. TADs have been first identified while investigating the 3D genome structure over High-throughput Chromosome Conformation Capture (Hi-C) interaction dataset. Substantial degree of efforts have been devoted to develop techniques for inferring TADs from Hi-C interaction dataset. Many TAD-calling methods have been developed which differ in their criteria and assumptions in TAD inference. Correspondingly, TADs inferred via these callers vary in terms of both similarities and biological features they are enriched in.
resultWe have carried out a systematic comparison of 27 TAD-calling methods over mammals. We use Micro-C, a recent high-resolution variant of Hi-C, to compare TADs at a very high resolution, and classify the methods into 3 categories: feature-based methods, Clustering methods, Graph-partitioning methods. We have evaluated TAD boundaries, gaps between adjacent TADs, and quality of TADs across various criteria. We also found particularly CTCF and Cohesin proteins to be effective in formation of TADs with corner dots. We have also assessed the callers performance on simulated datasets since a gold standard for TADs is missing. TAD sizes and numbers change remarkably between TAD callers and dataset resolutions, indicating that TADs are hierarchically-organized domains, instead of disjoint regions. A core subset of feature-based TAD callers regularly perform the best while inferring reproducible domains, which are also enriched for TAD related biological properties.
conclusionWe have analyzed the fundamental principles of TAD-calling methods, and identified the existing situation in TAD inference across high resolution Micro-C interaction datasets over mammals. We come up with a systematic, comprehensive, and concise framework to evaluate the TAD-calling methods performance across Micro-C datasets. Our research will be useful in selecting appropriate methods for TAD inference and evaluation based on available data, experimental design, and biological question of interest. We also introduce our analysis as a benchmarking tool with publicly available source code.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.