ArticleBMC microbiology2022
Standard rectal swabs as a surrogate sample for gut microbiome monitoring in intensive care.
Article in BMC microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07167173 (Predictive Model for Multidrug Resistance in Patients Admitted to the Emergency Department With Sepsis), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Predictive Model for Multidrug Resistance in Patients Admitted to the Emergency Department With Sepsis
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Difference analysis of intestinal microbiota in patients in the intensive care unit using different sampling methods: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Pooled it
- Antibiotic-associatedGut microbes · 2026Article
- The role of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in the relationship between intestinal colonization and post-ERCP biliary tract infection: a prospective cohort study.Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2026Article
- Assessing whether rectal swabs reflect appendiceal microbiota profiles in acute appendicitis: a 16S rRNA-based comparative study.Gut pathogens · 2026Article
- Comparison of microbiota profiles of fecal samples, rectal swabs and mucosal biopsies in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.Gut microbes reports · 2026Article
- Identification of robust associations between admission microbiome profiles and complications of acute pancreatitis.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2025Observational
- Functional Outcome Prediction of Acute Ischemic Stroke Based on the Oral and Gut Microbiota.Molecular neurobiology · 2025Observational
- Towards unraveling antimicrobial resistance dynamics: a longitudinal exploration of rectal swab metagenomes.BMC microbiology · 2025Article
- Sampling strategies for digestive system flora studies: current research and perspectives.PeerJ · 2025Review
- 3D printed rectal swabs for assessing the gut microbiome, metabolome and inflammation.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Anorectal Infections in Neutropenic Leukemia Patients: A Common Clinical Challenge.Journal of hematology · 2024Review
- Sepsis Stewardship: The Puzzle of Antibiotic Therapy in the Context of Individualization of Decision Making.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
- Impact of antibiotic prophylaxis on gut microbiota in colorectal surgery: insights from an Eastern European stewardship study.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024Article
- Integrated analysis reveals important differences in the gut and oropharyngeal microbiota between children with mild and severe hand, foot, and mouth disease.Emerging microbes & infections · 2023Article
- Dysbiosis of a microbiota-immune metasystem in critical illness is associated with nosocomial infections.Nature medicine · 2023Article
- Evaluation of a Shotgun Metagenomics Approach for Detection of ESBL- and/or Carbapenemase-ProducingMicroorganisms · 2023Article
- Differences in antimicrobial resistance gene abundance and microbial diversity of the gut microbiome in patients on antibiotics enrolled in a clinical trial.Therapeutic advances in infectious diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe purpose of this study was to investigate the use of routinely available rectal swabs as a surrogate sample type for testing the gut microbiome and monitoring antibiotic effects on key gut microorganisms, of patients hospitalised in an intensive care unit. A metagenomic whole genome sequencing approach was undertaken to determine the diversity of organisms as well as resistance genes and to compare findings between the two sampling techniques.
resultsNo significant difference was observed in overall diversity between the faeces and rectal swabs and sampling technique was not demonstrated to predict microbial community variation. More human DNA was present in the swabs and some differences were observed only for a select few anaerobes and bacteria also associated with skin and/or the female genitourinary system, possibly reflecting sampling site or technique. Antibiotics and collections at different times of admission were both considered significant influences on microbial community composition alteration. Detection of antibiotic resistance genes between rectal swabs and faeces were overall not significantly different, although some variations were detected with a potential association with the number of human sequence reads in a sample.
conclusionTesting the gut microbiome using standard rectal swab collection techniques currently used for multi-resistant organism screening has been demonstrated to have utility in gut microbiome monitoring in intensive care. The use of information from this article, in terms of methodology as well as near equivalence demonstrated between rectal swabs and faeces will be able to support and potentially facilitate the introduction into clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.