Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35413802›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2022

Standard rectal swabs as a surrogate sample for gut microbiome monitoring in intensive care.

Sanmarié Schlebusch, Rikki M A Graham, Amy V Jennison, Melissa M Lassig-Smith, Patrick N A Harris, Jeffrey Lipman, Páraic Ó Cuív, David L Paterson

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07167173 (Predictive Model for Multidrug Resistance in Patients Admitted to the Emergency Department With Sepsis), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07167173 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Predictive Model for Multidrug Resistance in Patients Admitted to the Emergency Department With Sepsis

TypeobservationalSponsorHospital Italiano de Buenos AiresRan2025 to 2025Enrolled10,000ConditionsSepsis, Septic Shock
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Antibiotic-associatedGut microbes · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sanmarié SchlebuschUniversity of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Herston, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. sanmarie.schlebusch@health.qld.gov.au.
Rikki M A GrahamQ-PHIRE Genomics and Public Health Microbiology, Forensic and Scientific Services, Coopers Plains, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Amy V JennisonQ-PHIRE Genomics and Public Health Microbiology, Forensic and Scientific Services, Coopers Plains, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Melissa M Lassig-SmithIntensive Care Services, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Patrick N A HarrisUniversity of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Herston, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Jeffrey LipmanUniversity of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Herston, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Páraic Ó CuívMater Research Institute, Translational Research Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
David L PatersonUniversity of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Herston, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Queensland Health · AUUniversity of Queensland · AURoyal Brisbane and Women's Hospital · AUUniversité de Nîmes · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of this study was to investigate the use of routinely available rectal swabs as a surrogate sample type for testing the gut microbiome and monitoring antibiotic effects on key gut microorganisms, of patients hospitalised in an intensive care unit. A metagenomic whole genome sequencing approach was undertaken to determine the diversity of organisms as well as resistance genes and to compare findings between the two sampling techniques.

resultsNo significant difference was observed in overall diversity between the faeces and rectal swabs and sampling technique was not demonstrated to predict microbial community variation. More human DNA was present in the swabs and some differences were observed only for a select few anaerobes and bacteria also associated with skin and/or the female genitourinary system, possibly reflecting sampling site or technique. Antibiotics and collections at different times of admission were both considered significant influences on microbial community composition alteration. Detection of antibiotic resistance genes between rectal swabs and faeces were overall not significantly different, although some variations were detected with a potential association with the number of human sequence reads in a sample.

conclusionTesting the gut microbiome using standard rectal swab collection techniques currently used for multi-resistant organism screening has been demonstrated to have utility in gut microbiome monitoring in intensive care. The use of information from this article, in terms of methodology as well as near equivalence demonstrated between rectal swabs and faeces will be able to support and potentially facilitate the introduction into clinical practice.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaAnti-Bacterial AgentsCritical CareFecesFemaleHumansRNA, Ribosomal, 16SAnti-Bacterial AgentsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SAntibiotic effectGut microbiomeICURectal swab

Identifiers

PMID35413802
PMCPMC9004175
OpenAlexW4223553026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.