Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35413795›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2022

Multi-trait genomic prediction using in-season physiological parameters increases prediction accuracy of complex traits in US wheat.

Dipendra Shahi, Jia Guo, Sumit Pradhan, Jahangir Khan, Muhsin Avci, Naeem Khan, Jordan McBreen, Guihua Bai, Matthew Reynolds, John Foulkes and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Comparative analysis of genomic prediction approaches for multiple time-resolved traits in maize.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Multi-trait ridge regression BLUP withFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Dipendra ShahiDepartment of Agronomy, 3105 McCarty Hall B, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA.
Jia GuoDepartment of Forest Ecosystem and Society, Oregon State University, 3180 SW Jefferson Way, Corvallis, OR, 97331, USA.
Sumit PradhanDepartment of Agronomy, 3105 McCarty Hall B, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA.
Jahangir KhanDepartment of Agronomy, 3105 McCarty Hall B, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA.
Muhsin AvciDepartment of Agronomy, 3105 McCarty Hall B, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA.
Naeem KhanDepartment of Agronomy, 3105 McCarty Hall B, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA.
Jordan McBreenDepartment of Agronomy, 3105 McCarty Hall B, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA.
Guihua BaiUSDA-ARS, Manhattan, KS, USA.
Matthew ReynoldsCIMMYT International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Km. 45, Carretera Mexico, El Batan, Texcoco, Mexico.
John FoulkesDivision of Plant and Crop Sciences, School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Leicestershire, LE12 5RD, UK.
Md Ali BabarDepartment of Agronomy, 3105 McCarty Hall B, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA. mababar@ufl.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecently genomic selection (GS) has emerged as an important tool for plant breeders to select superior genotypes. Multi-trait (MT) prediction model provides an opportunity to improve the predictive ability of expensive and labor-intensive traits. In this study, we assessed the potential use of a MT genomic prediction model by incorporating two physiological traits (canopy temperature, CT and normalized difference vegetation index, NDVI) to predict 5 complex primary traits (harvest index, HI; grain yield, GY; grain number, GN; spike partitioning index, SPI; fruiting efiiciency, FE) using two cross-validation schemes CV1 and CV2.

resultsIn this study, we evaluated 236 wheat genotypes in two locations in 2 years. The wheat genotypes were genotyped with genotyping by sequencing approach which generated 27,466 SNPs. MT-CV2 (multi-trait cross validation 2) model improved predictive ability by 4.8 to 138.5% compared to ST-CV1(single-trait cross validation 1). However, the predictive ability of MT-CV1 was not significantly different compared to the ST-CV1 model.

conclusionsThe study showed that the genomic prediction of complex traits such as HI, GN, and GY can be improved when correlated secondary traits (cheaper and easier phenotyping) are used. MT genomic selection could accelerate breeding cycles and improve genetic gain for complex traits in wheat and other crops.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantTriticumGenomicsGenotypeModels, GeneticMultifactorial InheritancePhenotypePlant BreedingSeasonsSelection, GeneticCanopy temperatureFruiting efficiencyGenomic predictionMulti-trait genomic predictionNDVISpike partitioning index

Identifiers

PMID35413795
PMCPMC9004054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.