Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35413514›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomechanics2022

Tekscan analysis programs (TAP) for quantifying dynamic contact mechanics.

Tony Chen, Ashley Pekmezian, Erin R Leatherman, Thomas J Santner, Suzanne A Maher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. In Pursuit of Quantifying Patient Knee Contact Mechanics: Finite Element Model Validation of Cadaveric Knees in Axially Loaded MRI Scans.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tony ChenDepartment of Biomechanics and Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY 10021 USA; Orthopedic Soft Tissue Research Program, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY 10021 USA. Electronic address: ChenTo@hss.edu.
Ashley PekmezianOrthopedic Soft Tissue Research Program, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY 10021 USA.
Erin R LeathermanDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Kenyon College, Gambier, OH 43022 USA.
Thomas J SantnerDepartment of Statistics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210 USA.
Suzanne A MaherDepartment of Biomechanics and Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY 10021 USA; Orthopedic Soft Tissue Research Program, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY 10021 USA.

Funding

How Partial Meniscectomy Affects Contact Mechanics and Tissue ResponseR01AR075523 · NIAMS · HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY · PI MAHER, SUZANNE A., RODEO, SCOTT A · 2019 to 2023
$2.1M
Mechanobiological Risk Factors for Initiation of Post Traumatic OsteoarthritisR01AR066635 · NIAMS · HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY · PI MAHER, SUZANNE A., TORZILLI, PETER A · 2015 to 2019
$2.0M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR066635NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR075523
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This short communication provides details on customized Tekscan Analysis Programs (TAP) which extract comprehensive contact mechanics metrics from piezoelectric sensors in articulating joints across repeated loading cycles. The code provides functionality to identify regions of interest (ROI), compute contact mechanic metrics, and compare contact mechanics across multiple test conditions or knees. Further, the variability of identifying ROIs was quantified between seven different users and compared to an expert. Overall, the contribution of four variables were studied: two knee specimens; two points in the gait cycle; two averaging methods; and seven observers, to determine if variations in these values played a role in accurately quantifying the ROI. The relative error between the force ratio from each observer's ROI and the expert ROI was calculated as the output of interest. A multivariate linear mixed effects model was fit to the four variables for the relative error with an observer- and knee-specific random intercept. Results from the fitted model showed a statistically significant difference at the 0.05 level in the mean relative errors at the two gait points. Additionally, variability in the relative errors attributed to the observer, knee, and random errors was quantified. To reduce variability amongst users, by ensuring low inter-observer variability and increasing segmentation accuracy of knee contact mechanics, a training module and manual have been included as supplemental material. By sharing this code and training manual, we envisage that it can be used and modified to analyze outputs from a range of sensors, joints, and test conditions.

Indexed as

GaitKnee JointBiomechanical PhenomenaCadaverHumansKneeCadaveric testingContact mechanicsMATLABSensorTekscan

Identifiers

PMID35413514
PMCPMC10150386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.