Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35413125›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2022

Mechanisms of sound production in deer mice (Peromyscus spp.).

Tobias Riede, Anastasiya Kobrina, Landon Bone, Tarana Darwaiz, Bret Pasch

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Water limitation modifies vocal performance in California mice: implications for acoustic communication under environmental stress.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Exploring nonlinear phenomena in animal vocalizations through oscillator theory.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Anatomy and mechanisms of vocal production in harvest mice.The Journal of experimental biology · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tobias RiedeDepartment of Physiology, Midwestern University Glendale, Glendale, AZ 85308, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6875-0017
Anastasiya KobrinaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011, USA.
Landon BoneArizona College of Osteopathic Medicine, Midwestern University Glendale, Glendale, AZ 85308, USA.
Tarana DarwaizDepartment of Physiology, Midwestern University Glendale, Glendale, AZ 85308, USA.
Bret PaschDepartment of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9168-6770
Midwestern University · USNorthern Arizona University · US

Funding

The Role of the Vocal Ligament in VocalizationR01DC018280 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI TITZE, INGO R · 2020 to 2024
$3.1M
National Science Foundation IOS # 1754332National Science Foundation IOS #1754332NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC018280NIH HHS 5R01DC018280-02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rodent diversification is associated with a large diversity of species-specific social vocalizations generated by two distinct laryngeal sound production mechanisms: whistling and airflow-induced vocal fold vibration. Understanding the relative importance of each modality to context-dependent acoustic interactions requires comparative analyses among closely related species. In this study, we used light gas experiments, acoustic analyses and laryngeal morphometrics to identify the distribution of the two mechanisms among six species of deer mice (Peromyscus spp.). We found that high frequency vocalizations (simple and complex sweeps) produced in close-distance contexts were generated by a whistle mechanism. In contrast, lower frequency sustained vocalizations (SVs) used in longer distance communication were produced by airflow-induced vocal fold vibrations. Pup isolation calls, which resemble adult SVs, were also produced by airflow-induced vocal fold vibrations. Nonlinear phenomena (NLP) were common in adult SVs and pup isolation calls, suggesting irregular vocal fold vibration characteristics. Both vocal production mechanisms were facilitated by a characteristic laryngeal morphology, including a two-layered vocal fold lamina propria, small vocal membrane-like extensions on the free edge of the vocal fold, and a singular ventral laryngeal air pocket known as the ventral pouch. The size and composition of vocal folds (rather than total laryngeal size) appears to contribute to species-specific acoustic properties. Our findings suggest that dual modes of sound production are more widespread among rodents than previously appreciated. Additionally, the common occurrence of NLP highlights the nonlinearity of the vocal apparatus, whereby small changes in anatomy or physiology trigger large changes in behavior. Finally, consistency in mechanisms of sound production used by neonates and adults underscores the importance of considering vocal ontogeny in the diversification of species-specific acoustic signals.

Indexed as

LarynxPeromyscusAnimalsRodentiaSoundVibrationVocal CordsVocalization, AnimalBioacousticsCricetidaeHelioxLarynxNonlinear phenomenaSource-filter theory

Identifiers

PMID35413125
PMCPMC9163445
OpenAlexW4223601219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.