ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2022
Mechanisms of sound production in deer mice (Peromyscus spp.).
Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Water limitation modifies vocal performance in California mice: implications for acoustic communication under environmental stress.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2026Article
- Phylogenomic analysis of vocal fold length evolution reveals links between vocal and auditory systems in terrestrial mammals.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Postnatal development and form-function relationships of the vocal folds in California mice (American journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2026Article
- Developmental trajectories in laryngeal anatomy of California mice (Royal Society open science · 2025Article
- Vocal characteristics of distress and reproductive vocalizations in North American wapiti.Current zoology · 2025Article
- A proposal for epithelial dominance in extremely high fundamental frequency vocalizations.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2025Article
- Auditory brainstem responses in two closely related Peromyscus species (Peromyscus leucopus and Peromyscus maniculatus).The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2025Article
- Exploring nonlinear phenomena in animal vocalizations through oscillator theory.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025Review
- Assessment of Formalin-Fixed Bovine Larynx Asymmetry Using Geometric Morphometry.TheScientificWorldJournal · 2025Article
- California mice (Peromyscus californicus) adjust mouth movements for vocal production during early postnatal development.BMC biology · 2024Article
- Acoustic complexity of pup isolation calls in Mongolian hamsters: 3-frequency phenomena and chaos.Current zoology · 2024Article
- Anatomy and mechanisms of vocal production in harvest mice.The Journal of experimental biology · 2024Article
- Temporal dynamics of isolation calls emitted by pups in environmental and genetic mouse models of autism spectrum disorder.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Rodent diversification is associated with a large diversity of species-specific social vocalizations generated by two distinct laryngeal sound production mechanisms: whistling and airflow-induced vocal fold vibration. Understanding the relative importance of each modality to context-dependent acoustic interactions requires comparative analyses among closely related species. In this study, we used light gas experiments, acoustic analyses and laryngeal morphometrics to identify the distribution of the two mechanisms among six species of deer mice (Peromyscus spp.). We found that high frequency vocalizations (simple and complex sweeps) produced in close-distance contexts were generated by a whistle mechanism. In contrast, lower frequency sustained vocalizations (SVs) used in longer distance communication were produced by airflow-induced vocal fold vibrations. Pup isolation calls, which resemble adult SVs, were also produced by airflow-induced vocal fold vibrations. Nonlinear phenomena (NLP) were common in adult SVs and pup isolation calls, suggesting irregular vocal fold vibration characteristics. Both vocal production mechanisms were facilitated by a characteristic laryngeal morphology, including a two-layered vocal fold lamina propria, small vocal membrane-like extensions on the free edge of the vocal fold, and a singular ventral laryngeal air pocket known as the ventral pouch. The size and composition of vocal folds (rather than total laryngeal size) appears to contribute to species-specific acoustic properties. Our findings suggest that dual modes of sound production are more widespread among rodents than previously appreciated. Additionally, the common occurrence of NLP highlights the nonlinearity of the vocal apparatus, whereby small changes in anatomy or physiology trigger large changes in behavior. Finally, consistency in mechanisms of sound production used by neonates and adults underscores the importance of considering vocal ontogeny in the diversification of species-specific acoustic signals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.