ArticleCancer immunology research2022
Visualizing Spatial and Stoichiometric Barriers to Bispecific T-Cell Engager Efficacy.
Article in Cancer immunology research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Drug-Gated, Modular STAb-T Immunotherapy With External Control.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Molecular features of response and resistance to glofitamab, a T-cell engager for treatment of large B-cell lymphoma.Blood advances · 2026Article
- An Overview on T-Cell Engagers: The Current Position in Both the Biological and Mathematical Context.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Review
- Review
- Improving CD3 bispecific antibody therapy in solid tumors using combination strategies.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- SC134-TCB Targeting Fucosyl-GM1, a T Cell-Engaging Antibody with Potent Antitumor Activity in Preclinical Small Cell Lung Cancer Models.Molecular cancer therapeutics · 2024Article
- Computational simulations of bispecific T cell engagers by a multiscale model.Biophysical journal · 2024Article
- T-cell stimulating vaccines empower CD3 bispecific antibody therapy in solid tumors.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Defining the Intravital Renal Disposition of Fluorescence-Quenched Exenatide.Molecular pharmaceutics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE) molecules are biologic T cell-directing immunotherapies. Blinatumomab is approved for treatment of B-cell malignancies, but BiTE molecule development in solid tumors has been more challenging. Here, we employed intravital imaging to characterize exposure and pharmacodynamic response of an anti-muCD3/anti-huEGFRvIII mouse surrogate BiTE molecule in EGFR variant III (EGFRvIII)-positive breast tumors implanted within immunocompetent mice. Our study revealed heterogeneous temporal and spatial dynamics of BiTE molecule extravasation into solid tumors, highlighting physical barriers to BiTE molecule function. We also discovered that high, homogeneous EGFRvIII expression on cancer cells was necessary for a BiTE molecule to efficiently clear tumors. In addition, we found that resident tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) were sufficient for optimal tumor killing only at high BiTE molecule dosage, whereas inclusion of peripheral T-cell recruitment was synergistic at moderate to low dosages. We report that deletion of stimulatory conventional type I DCs (cDC1) diminished BiTE molecule-induced T-cell activation and tumor clearance, suggesting that in situ antigen-presenting cell (APC) engagements modulate the extent of BiTE molecule efficacy. In summary, our work identified multiple requirements for optimal BiTE molecule efficacy in solid tumors, providing insights that could be harnessed for solid cancer immunotherapy development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.