Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35413094›Full record

ArticleHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2022

Whole-exome sequencing in patients with maturation arrest: a potential additional diagnostic tool for prevention of recurrent negative testicular sperm extraction outcomes.

F Ghieh, A L Barbotin, N Swierkowski-Blanchard, C Leroy, J Fortemps, C Gerault, C Hue, H Mambu Mambueni, S Jaillard, M Albert and 13 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Human sperm RNA in male infertility.Nature reviews. Urology · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

F GhiehUniversité Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, INRAE, BREED, Jouy-en-Josas, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6454-2165
A L BarbotinInstitut de Biologie de la Reproduction-Spermiologie-CECOS, Hôpital Jeanne de Flandre, Centre Hospitalier et Universitaire, Lille, France.
N Swierkowski-BlanchardUniversité Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, INRAE, BREED, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
C LeroyInstitut de Biologie de la Reproduction-Spermiologie-CECOS, Hôpital Jeanne de Flandre, Centre Hospitalier et Universitaire, Lille, France.
J FortempsService d'Anatomie Pathologique, CHI de Poissy/Saint-Germain-en-Laye, Saint-Germain-en-Laye, France.
C GeraultDépartement de Génétique, Laboratoire de Biologie Médicale, CHI de Poissy/Saint-Germain-en-Laye, Poissy, France.
C HueDepartment of Biotechnology and Health, UVSQ, Université Paris-Saclay, Inserm UMR 1173, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France.
H Mambu MambueniDepartment of Biotechnology and Health, UVSQ, Université Paris-Saclay, Inserm UMR 1173, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France.
S JaillardService de Cytogénétique, CHU Rennes, Rennes, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0593-0261
M AlbertUniversité Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, INRAE, BREED, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
M BaillyDépartement de Gynécologie Obstétrique, CHI de Poissy/Saint-Germain-en-Laye, Poissy, France.
V IzardService d'Urologie, AP-HP, Université Paris-Saclay, Hôpital de Bicêtre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.
D Molina-GomesDépartement de Génétique, Laboratoire de Biologie Médicale, CHI de Poissy/Saint-Germain-en-Laye, Poissy, France.
F MarcelliInstitut de Biologie de la Reproduction-Spermiologie-CECOS, Hôpital Jeanne de Flandre, Centre Hospitalier et Universitaire, Lille, France.
J PrasivoravongInstitut de Biologie de la Reproduction-Spermiologie-CECOS, Hôpital Jeanne de Flandre, Centre Hospitalier et Universitaire, Lille, France.
V SerazinUniversité Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, INRAE, BREED, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
M N DieudonneUniversité Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, INRAE, BREED, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
M DelcroixDépartement de Génétique, Laboratoire de Biologie Médicale, CHI de Poissy/Saint-Germain-en-Laye, Poissy, France.
H J GarchonDepartment of Biotechnology and Health, UVSQ, Université Paris-Saclay, Inserm UMR 1173, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3632-2290
A LouboutinService d'Anatomie Pathologique, CHI de Poissy/Saint-Germain-en-Laye, Saint-Germain-en-Laye, France.
B Mandon-PepinUniversité Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, INRAE, BREED, Jouy-en-Josas, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5424-0822
S FerlicotService d'Anatomie Pathologique, AP-HP, Université Paris-Saclay, Hôpital de Bicêtre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4124-9227
F VialardUniversité Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, INRAE, BREED, Jouy-en-Josas, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5774-2756
École Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort · FRCentre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Poissy · FRHôpital Jeanne de Flandre · FRInserm · FRUniversité Paris-Saclay · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study questionCould whole-exome sequencing (WES) be useful in clinical practice for men with maturation arrest (MA) after a first testicular sperm extraction (TESE)? SUMMARY ANSWER: WES in combination with TESE yields substantial additional information and may potentially be added as a test to predict a negative outcome of a recurrent TESE in patients with MA. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: At present, the only definitive contraindications for TESE in men with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) are a 46,XX karyotype and microdeletions in the azoospermia factor a (AZFa) and/or AZFb regions. After a first negative TESE with MA, no test currently exists to predict a negative outcome of a recurrent TESE. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: In a cohort study, we retrospectively included 26 patients with idiopathic NOA caused by complete MA diagnosed after a first TESE. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,

methodsTwenty-six men with MA at the spermatocyte stage in all seminiferous tubules, according to a histopathological analysis performed independently by two expert histologists, and a normal karyotype (i.e. no AZF gene microdeletions on the Y chromosome) were included. Single-nucleotide polymorphism comparative genomic hybridization array and WES were carried out. The results were validated with Sanger sequencing. For all the variants thought to influence spermatogenesis, we used immunohistochemical techniques to analyse the level of the altered protein. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Deleterious homozygous variants were identified in all seven consanguineous patients and in three of the 19 non-consanguineous patients. Compound heterozygous variants were identified in another 5 of the 19 non-consanguineous patients. No recurrent variants were identified. We found new variants in genes known to be involved in azoospermia or MA [including testis expressed 11 (TEX11), meiotic double-stranded break formation protein 1 (MEI1), proteasome 26s subunit, ATPase 3 interacting protein (PSMC3IP), synaptonemal complex central element protein 1 (SYCE1) and Fanconi anaemia complementation group M (FANCM) and variants in genes not previously linked to human MA (including CCCTC-binding factor like (CTCFL), Mov10 like RISC complex RNA helicase 1 (MOV10L1), chromosome 11 open reading frame 80 (C11ORF80) and exonuclease 1 (EXO1)]. LARGE SCALE DATA: Data available on request. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: More data are required before WES screening can be used to avoid recurrent TESE, although screening should be recommended for men with a consanguineous family background. WES is still a complex technology and can generate incidental findings. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE

findingsOur results confirmed the genetic aetiology of MA in most patients: the proportion of individuals with at least one pathologic variant was 50% in the overall study population and 100% in the consanguineous patients. With the exception of MEI1 (compound heterozygous variants of which were identified in two cases), each variant corresponded to a specific gene-confirming the high degree of genetic heterogeneity in men with MA. Our results suggest that WES screening could help to avoid recurrent, futile TESE in men with MA in general and in consanguineous individuals in particular, but these results need to be confirmed in future studies before clinical implementation. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): The study was funded by the Fondation Maladies Rares (Paris, France), Merck (Kenilworth, NJ, USA), IRSF (Montigny le Bretonneux, France) and Agence de la Biomédecine (Saint Denis, France). There are no competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Indexed as

AzoospermiaCohort StudiesComparative Genomic HybridizationDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA HelicasesExome SequencingHumansMaleNuclear ProteinsRetrospective StudiesRNA HelicasesSpermatozoaSperm RetrievalTestisTrans-ActivatorsCTCFL protein, humanDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA HelicasesFANCM protein, humanMov10 protein, humanNuclear ProteinsPSMC3IP protein, humanRNA HelicasesTrans-Activatorsazoospermiaconsanguinitymeiosisnon-obstructive azoospermiaspermatogenic arresttesticular sperm extractionwhole-exome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID35413094
PMCPMC9156845
OpenAlexW4223530923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.