Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35413082›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Health risks to children from exposure to fecally-contaminated recreational water.

Timothy J Wade, Benjamin F Arnold, Ken Schiff, John M Colford, Stephen B Weisberg, John F Griffith, Alfred P Dufour

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. A Review of the Human Health Risks from Microbial Hazards in Recreational Beach Sand.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Climate change and public health in California: A structured review of exposures, vulnerable populations, and adaptation measures.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Timothy J WadeU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7843-0997
Benjamin F ArnoldF.I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6105-7295
Ken SchiffSouthern California Coastal Water Research Project, Costa Mesa, California, United States of America.
John M ColfordUniversity of California, Berkeley, Division of Epidemiology, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
Stephen B WeisbergSouthern California Coastal Water Research Project, Costa Mesa, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0655-9425
John F GriffithSouthern California Coastal Water Research Project, Costa Mesa, California, United States of America.
Alfred P DufourU.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States of America.
Southern California Coastal Water Research Project · USEnvironmental Protection Agency · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChildren may be at higher risk for swimming-associated illness following exposure to fecally-contaminated recreational waters. We analyzed a pooled data set of over 80,000 beachgoers from 13 beach sites across the United States to compare risks associated with the fecal indicator bacteria Enterococcus spp. (measured by colony forming units, CFU and quantitative polymerase chain reaction cell equivalents, qPCR CE) for different age groups across different exposures, sites and health endpoints.

methodsSites were categorized according to the predominant type of fecal contamination (human or non-human). Swimming exposures of varying intensity were considered according to degree of contact and time spent in the water. Health endpoints included gastrointestinal and respiratory symptoms and skin rashes. Logistic regression models were used to analyze the risk of illness as a function of fecal contamination in water as measured by Enterococcus spp. among the exposed groups. Non-swimmers (those who did not enter the water) were excluded from the models to reduce bias and facilitate comparison across groups.

resultsGastrointestinal symptoms were the most sensitive health endpoint and strongest associations were observed with Enterococcus qPCR CE at sites impacted by human fecal contamination. Under several exposure scenarios, associations between illness and Enterococcus spp. levels were significantly higher among children compared to adolescents and adults. Respiratory symptoms were also associated with Enterococcus spp. exposures among young children at sites affected by human fecal sources, although small sample sizes resulted in imprecise estimates for these associations.

conclusionUnder many exposure scenarios, children were at higher risk of illness associated with exposure to fecal contamination as measured by the indicator bacteria Enterococcus spp. The source of fecal contamination and the intensity of swimming exposure were also important factors affecting the association between Enterococcus spp. and swimming-associated illness.

Indexed as

Bathing BeachesWater PollutionAdolescentAdultChild, PreschoolEnterococcusEnvironmental MonitoringFecesHumansWaterWater MicrobiologyWater

Identifiers

PMID35413082
PMCPMC9004770
OpenAlexW4223510650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.