Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35412950›Full record

ArticleCell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)2022

A comparison of isolation and culture protocols for human amniotic mesenchymal stem cells.

Aisha Naeem, Nikita Gupta, Usra Naeem, Muhammad Jawad Khan, Mohamed A Elrayess, Wanxing Cui, Chris Albanese

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Aisha NaeemDepartment of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Nikita GuptaDepartment of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Usra NaeemDepartment of Health Professional Technology, University of Lahore, Pakistan.
Muhammad Jawad KhanDepartment of Biosciences, COMSATS University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Mohamed A ElrayessOmics, Biomedical Research Center, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.
Wanxing CuiCell Therapy Manufacturing Facility, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
Chris AlbaneseDepartment of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Georgetown University · USCOMSATS University Islamabad · PKGeorgetown University Medical Center · USMedStar Georgetown University Hospital · USQatar University · QAUniversity of Health Sciences Lahore · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The successful translation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) from bench to bedside is predicated upon their regenerative capabilities and immunomodulatory potential. Many challenges still exist in making MSCs a viable and cost-effective therapeutic option, due in part to the challenges of sourcing MSCs from adult tissues and inconsistencies in the characterization of MSCs. In many cases, adult MSC collection is an invasive procedure, and ethical concerns and age-related heterogeneity further complicate obtaining adult tissue derived MSCs at the scales needed for clinical applications. Alternative adult sources, such as post-partum associated tissues, offer distinct advantages to overcome these challenges. However, successful therapeutic applications rely on the efficient ex-vivo expansion of the stem cells while avoiding any culture-related phenotypic alterations, which requires optimized and standardized isolation, culture, and cell preservation methods. In this review, we have compared the isolation and culture methods for MSCs originating from the human amniotic membrane (hAMSCs) of the placenta to identify the elements that support the extended subculture potential of hAMSCs without compromising their immune-privileged, pluripotent regenerative potential.

Indexed as

AmnionMesenchymal Stem CellsAdipose TissueAdultCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationCells, CulturedEmbryonic Stem CellsFemaleHumansPregnancyReview Literature as Topicamniotic membranecultureisolationMesenchymal stem cellsstem cell markers

Identifiers

PMID35412950
PMCPMC9291641
OpenAlexW4223413146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.