Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35412913›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

MoSBi: Automated signature mining for molecular stratification and subtyping.

Tim Daniel Rose, Thibault Bechtler, Octavia-Andreea Ciora, Kim Anh Lilian Le, Florian Molnar, Nikolai Köhler, Jan Baumbach, Richard Röttger, Josch Konstantin Pauling

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tim Daniel RoseLipiTUM, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 65354 Freising, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5491-7330
Thibault BechtlerLipiTUM, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 65354 Freising, Germany.
Octavia-Andreea CioraLipiTUM, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 65354 Freising, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9399-781X
Kim Anh Lilian LeLipiTUM, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 65354 Freising, Germany.
Florian MolnarLipiTUM, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 65354 Freising, Germany.
Nikolai KöhlerLipiTUM, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 65354 Freising, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5103-883X
Jan BaumbachDepartment for Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense, Denmark.
Richard RöttgerInstitute for Computational Systems Biology, University of Hamburg, 22607 Hamburg, Germany.
Josch Konstantin PaulingLipiTUM, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 65354 Freising, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The improving access to increasing amounts of biomedical data provides completely new chances for advanced patient stratification and disease subtyping strategies. This requires computational tools that produce uniformly robust results across highly heterogeneous molecular data. Unsupervised machine learning methodologies are able to discover de novo patterns in such data. Biclustering is especially suited by simultaneously identifying sample groups and corresponding feature sets across heterogeneous omics data. The performance of available biclustering algorithms heavily depends on individual parameterization and varies with their application. Here, we developed MoSBi (molecular signature identification using biclustering), an automated multialgorithm ensemble approach that integrates results utilizing an error model-supported similarity network. We systematically evaluated the performance of 11 available and established biclustering algorithms together with MoSBi. For this, we used transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics data, as well as synthetic datasets covering various data properties. Profiting from multialgorithm integration, MoSBi identified robust group and disease-specific signatures across all scenarios, overcoming single algorithm specificities. Furthermore, we developed a scalable network-based visualization of bicluster communities that supports biological hypothesis generation. MoSBi is available as an R package and web service to make automated biclustering analysis accessible for application in molecular sample stratification.

Indexed as

DiseaseGene Expression ProfilingMetabolomicsPatientsProteomicsSoftwareAlgorithmsCluster AnalysisHumansbiclusteringmultiomicspathomechanismstratificationsubtyping

Identifiers

PMID35412913
PMCPMC9169782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.