Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35412886›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

Activation mechanism of the μ-opioid receptor by an allosteric modulator.

Shun Kaneko, Shunsuke Imai, Nobuaki Asao, Yutaka Kofuku, Takumi Ueda, Ichio Shimada

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Activation dynamics of a water-soluble human mu-opioid receptor.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Biased Allosteric Modulation in GPCR Drug Discovery.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2026
    Review
  8. The Human Omnibus of Targetable Pockets.Journal of cheminformatics · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. CBD Versus CBDP: Comparing In Vitro Receptor-Binding Activities.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shun KanekoCenter for Biosystems Dynamics Research, RIKEN, Kanagawa 230-0045, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5008-9494
Shunsuke ImaiCenter for Biosystems Dynamics Research, RIKEN, Kanagawa 230-0045, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9346-2359
Nobuaki AsaoCenter for Biosystems Dynamics Research, RIKEN, Kanagawa 230-0045, Japan.
Yutaka KofukuGraduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.
Takumi UedaGraduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.
Ichio ShimadaCenter for Biosystems Dynamics Research, RIKEN, Kanagawa 230-0045, Japan.
RIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research · JPThe University of Tokyo · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Allosteric modulators of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) enhance signaling by binding to GPCRs concurrently with their orthosteric ligands, offering a novel approach to overcome the efficacy limitations of conventional orthosteric ligands. However, the structural mechanism by which allosteric modulators mediate GPCR signaling remains largely unknown. Here, to elucidate the mechanism of μ-opioid receptor (MOR) activation by allosteric modulators, we conducted solution NMR analyses of MOR by monitoring the signals from methionine methyl groups. We found that the intracellular side of MOR exists in an equilibrium between three conformations with different activities. Interestingly, the populations in the equilibrium determine the apparent signaling activity of MOR. Our analyses also revealed that the equilibrium is not fully shifted to the conformation with the highest activity even in the full agonist-bound state, where the intracellular half of TM6 is outward-shifted. Surprisingly, an allosteric modulator for MOR, BMS-986122, shifted the equilibrium toward the conformation with the highest activity, leading to the increased activity of MOR in the full agonist-bound state. We also determined that BMS-986122 binds to a cleft in the transmembrane region around T162 on TM3. Together, these results suggest that BMS-986122 binding to TM3 increases the activity of MOR by rearranging the direct interactions of TM3 and TM6, thus stabilizing TM6 in the outward-shifted position which is favorable for G-protein binding. These findings shed light on the rational developments of novel allosteric modulators that activate GPCRs further than orthosteric ligands alone and pave the way for next-generation GPCR-targeting therapeutics.

Indexed as

Receptors, Opioid, muSulfonesAllosteric RegulationAllosteric SiteBinding SitesLigandsProtein ConformationSignal TransductionBMS-986122LigandsReceptors, Opioid, muSulfonesallosteric modulatorGPCRsolution NMR

Identifiers

PMID35412886
PMCPMC9169721
OpenAlexW4223413162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.