Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35412683›Full record

ArticleJournal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV2022

Moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in adolescents treated with dupilumab: A multicentre Italian real-world experience.

L Stingeni, L Bianchi, E Antonelli, E S Caroppo, S M Ferrucci, M Ortoncelli, G Fabbrocini, E Nettis, D Schena, M Napolitano and 27 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

37 authors at 20 institutions in 1 country.

L StingeniDermatology Section, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7919-8141
L BianchiDermatology Section, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
E AntonelliDermatology Section, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
E S CaroppoDermatology Section, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
S M FerrucciDermatology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
M OrtoncelliDivision of Dermatology, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
G FabbrociniSection of Dermatology, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
E NettisDepartment of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, Allergology and Clinical Immunology, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
D SchenaSection of Dermatology and Venereology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
M NapolitanoDepartment of Medicine and Health Sciences Vincenzo Tiberio, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3309-8190
M GolaUnit of Allergological and Pediatric Dermatology, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
L BonzanoDermatology Unit, Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova, Azienda USL-IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8933-4626
M RossiDepartment of Dermatology, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
A Belloni FortinaUnit of Dermatology, Department of Medicine DIMED, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5791-0775
A BalatoUnit of Dermatology, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5485-0172
K PerisInstitute of Dermatology, Catholic University, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1957-6600
C FotiSection of Dermatology, Department of Biomedical Science and Human Oncology, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
F GuarneriSection of Dermatology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0805-8496
M RomanelliDermatology Unit, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4127-0141
C PatrunoSection of Dermatology, Health Sciences Department, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy.
P SavoiaDermatology Clinic, Department of Health Science, University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1636-8411
M C FargnoliDermatology, Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7249-2556
F RussoSection of Dermatology, Department of Clinical, Surgical Medicine and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
E ErrichettiInstitute of Dermatology, Department of Medicine (DAME), University of Udine, Udine, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7152-6136
T BianchelliDermatology Unit, Istituto Nazionale di Riposo e Cura per Anziani, INRCA-IRCCS Hospital, Ancona, Italy.
L BianchiDermatology Unit, System Medicine Department, University of Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
G PellacaniDepartment of Dermatology, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7222-2951
C FelicianiSection of Dermatology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0883-3210
A OffidaniDermatology Clinic, Clinical and Molecular Science Department, Polytechnic Marche University, Ancona, Italy.
M CorazzaSection of Dermatology, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
G MicaliDermatology Clinic, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
N MilanesiAllergological and Occupational Dermatology Unit, Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1055-3867
G MalaraDermatology Unit, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano, Reggio Calabria, Italy.
A ChiricozziInstitute of Dermatology, Catholic University, Rome, Italy.
M TramontanaDermatology Section, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
K HanselDermatology Section, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6674-4278
DADA - Dupilumab for Atopic Dermatitis of the Adolescence Study Group
University of Perugia · ITUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · ITUniversity of Florence · ITUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata · ITAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia · ITFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITMagna Graecia University · ITMarche Polytechnic University · ITOspedale Santa Maria · ITPoliclinico Umberto I · ITUniversità degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro” · ITUniversity of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · ITUniversity of Catania · ITUniversity of Ferrara · ITUniversity of L'Aquila · ITUniversity of Messina · ITUniversity of Molise · ITUniversity of Naples Federico II · ITUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundModerate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in the adolescence is a high burden disease, and its treatment can be very challenging due to paucity of approved systemic drugs for this age and their side-effects. Dupilumab was recently approved for treatment of adolescent AD.

objectivesA multicentre, prospective, real-world study on the effectiveness and safety of dupilumab in adolescents (aged from ≥12 to <18 years) with moderate-to-severe AD was conducted. The main AD clinical phenotypes were also examined.

methodsData of adolescents with moderate-to-severe AD treated with dupilumab at label dosage for 16 weeks were collected. Treatment outcome was assessed by EASI, NRS itch, NRS sleep loss and CDLQI scores at baseline and after 16 weeks of treatment. The clinical scores were also evaluated according to clinical phenotypes.

resultsOne hundred and thirty-nine adolescents were enrolled in the study. Flexural eczema and head and neck eczema were the most frequent clinical phenotypes, followed by hand eczema and portrait-like dermatitis. Coexistence of more than 1 phenotype was documented in 126/139 (88.5%) adolescents. Three patients (2.1%) contracted asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection and 1 of the discontinued dupilumab treatment before the target treatment period. A significant improvement in EASI, NRS itch, NRS sleep loss and CDLQI was observed after 16 weeks of treatment with dupilumab. This outcome was better than that observed in clinical trials. Dupilumab resulted effective in all AD phenotypes, especially in diffuse eczema. Twenty-eight (20.1%) patients reported adverse events, conjunctivitis and flushing being the most frequent. None of patients discontinued dupilumab due to adverse event.

conclusionsDupilumab in adolescent AD showed excellent effectiveness at week 16 with consistent improvement of all clinical scores. Moreover, dupilumab showed a good safety profile also in this COVID-19 pandemic era.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentDermatitis, AtopicEczemaAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedDouble-Blind MethodHumansPandemicsProspective StudiesPruritusSARS-CoV-2Severity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, Humanizeddupilumab

Identifiers

PMID35412683
PMCPMC9542087
OpenAlexW4223478738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.