Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35412626›Full record

SynthesisJAMA network open2022

Immunogenicity and Risk Factors Associated With Poor Humoral Immune Response of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines in Recipients of Solid Organ Transplant: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Kasama Manothummetha, Nipat Chuleerarux, Anawin Sanguankeo, Olivia S Kates, Nattiya Hirankarn, Achitpol Thongkam, M Veronica Dioverti-Prono, Pattama Torvorapanit, Nattapong Langsiri, Navaporn Worasilchai and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
10.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 109 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Cytomegalovirus Vaccines in Transplantation: History, Hurdles, and Hope.Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Vaccination in dermatology 2025: Update considering current recommendations of the German Standing Committee on Vaccination.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Kasama ManothummethaDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Nipat ChuleeraruxDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Anawin SanguankeoDepartment of Preventive and Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Olivia S KatesDepartment of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Nattiya HirankarnDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Achitpol ThongkamDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
M Veronica Dioverti-PronoDepartment of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Pattama TorvorapanitDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Nattapong LangsiriDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Navaporn WorasilchaiFaculty of Allied Health Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Chatphatai MoonlaDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Rongpong PlonglaDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
William M GarneauDepartment of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Ariya ChindampornDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Pitchaphon NissaisorakarnDepartment of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
Tany ThaniyavarnDepartment of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Saman NematollahiDepartment of Medicine, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson.
Nitipong PermpalungDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Chulalongkorn University · THJohns Hopkins Medicine · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USJohns Hopkins University · USKing Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital · THMassachusetts General Hospital · USSiriraj Hospital · THUniversity of Arizona · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Recipients of solid organ transplant (SOT) experience decreased immunogenicity after COVID-19 vaccination. Objective: To summarize current evidence on vaccine responses and identify risk factors for diminished humoral immune response in recipients of SOT. Data Sources: A literature search was conducted from existence of database through December 15, 2021, using MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Study Selection: Studies reporting humoral immune response of the COVID-19 vaccines in recipients of SOT were reviewed. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Two reviewers independently extracted data from each eligible study. Descriptive statistics and a random-effects model were used. This report was prepared following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline. Data were analyzed from December 2021 to February 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures: The total numbers of positive immune responses and percentage across each vaccine platform were recorded. Pooled odds ratios (pORs) with 95% CIs were used to calculate the pooled effect estimates of risk factors for poor antibody response. Results: A total of 83 studies were included for the systematic review, and 29 studies were included in the meta-analysis, representing 11 713 recipients of SOT. The weighted mean (range) of total positive humoral response for antispike antibodies after receipt of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine was 10.4% (0%-37.9%) for 1 dose, 44.9% (0%-79.1%) for 2 doses, and 63.1% (49.1%-69.1%) for 3 doses. In 2 studies, 50% of recipients of SOT with no or minimal antibody response after 3 doses of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine mounted an antibody response after a fourth dose. Among the factors associated with poor antibody response were older age (mean [SE] age difference between responders and nonresponders, 3.94 [1.1] years), deceased donor status (pOR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.53-0.83]; I2 = 0%), antimetabolite use (pOR, 0.21 [95% CI, 0.14-0.29]; I2 = 70%), recent rituximab exposure (pOR, 0.21 [95% CI, 0.07-0.61]; I2 = 0%), and recent antithymocyte globulin exposure (pOR, 0.32 [95% CI, 0.15-0.71]; I2 = 0%). Conclusions and Relevance: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the rates of positive antibody response in solid organ transplant recipients remained low despite multiple doses of mRNA vaccines. These findings suggest that more efforts are needed to modulate the risk factors associated with reduced humoral responses and to study monoclonal antibody prophylaxis among recipients of SOT who are at high risk of diminished humoral response.

Indexed as

COVID-19Organ TransplantationChild, PreschoolCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansImmunity, HumoralRisk FactorsRNA, MessengerSARS-CoV-2COVID-19 VaccinesRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID35412626
PMCPMC9006106
OpenAlexW4223436440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.