Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35412593›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2023

Genomic Insights Into the Mechanism of Carbapenem Resistance Dissemination in Enterobacterales From a Tertiary Public Heath Setting in South Asia.

Refath Farzana, Lim S Jones, Md Anisur Rahman, Kirsty Sands, Andries J van Tonder, Edward Portal, Jose Munoz Criollo, Julian Parkhill, Martyn F Guest, W John Watkins and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Surveillance of enteropathogenicJournal of medical microbiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. High-risk clonal expansion of IMP-producingAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2025
    Article
  7. Mobile genetic elements in shapingFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Whole-genome sequencing ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Insight into the Mechanisms of Carbapenem Resistance inAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  16. Carbapenem resistance inAIMS microbiology · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Refath FarzanaDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Lim S JonesPublic Health Wales Microbiology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Md Anisur RahmanAbdul Malek Ukil Medical College, Noakhali, Bangladesh.
Kirsty SandsDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Andries J van TonderDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Edward PortalDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Institute of Infection and Immunity, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Jose Munoz CriolloAdvanced Research Computing @Cardiff (ARCCA), Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Julian ParkhillDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Martyn F GuestAdvanced Research Computing @Cardiff (ARCCA), Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
W John WatkinsInstitute of Infection and Immunity, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Monira PervinDepartment of Virology, Dhaka Medical College, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Ian BoostromDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Institute of Infection and Immunity, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Brekhna HassanDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Institute of Infection and Immunity, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Jordan MathiasDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Institute of Infection and Immunity, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Md Abul KalamSheikh Hasina National Institute of Burn and Plastic Surgery, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Timothy R WalshDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Cardiff University · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBDhaka Medical College and Hospital · BDNoakhali Science and Technology University · BDPublic Health Wales · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

summary10.6% patients were CRE positive. Only 27% patients were prescribed at least 1 antibiotic to which infecting pathogen was susceptible. Burn and ICU admission and antibiotics exposures facilitate CRE acquisition. Escherichia coli ST167 was the dominant CRE clone.

backgroundGiven the high prevalence of multidrug resistance (MDR) across South Asian (SA) hospitals, we documented the epidemiology of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) infections at Dhaka Medical College Hospital between October 2016 and September 2017.

methodsWe enrolled patients and collected epidemiology and outcome data. All Enterobacterales were characterized phenotypically and by whole-genome sequencing. Risk assessment for the patients with CRE was performed compared with patients with carbapenem-susceptible Enterobacterales (CSE).

results10.6% of all 1831 patients with a clinical specimen collected had CRE. In-hospital 30-day mortality was significantly higher with CRE [50/180 (27.8%)] than CSE [42/312 (13.5%)] (P = .001); however, for bloodstream infections, this was nonsignificant. Of 643 Enterobacterales isolated, 210 were CRE; blaNDM was present in 180 isolates, blaOXA-232 in 26, blaOXA-181 in 24, and blaKPC-2 in 5. Despite this, ceftriaxone was the most commonly prescribed empirical antibiotic and only 27% of patients were prescribed at least 1 antibiotic to which their infecting pathogen was susceptible. Significant risk factors for CRE isolation included burns unit and intensive care unit admission, and prior exposure to levofloxacin, amikacin, clindamycin, and meropenem. Escherichia coli ST167 was the dominant CRE clone. Clustering suggested clonal transmission of Klebsiella pneumoniae ST15 and the MDR hypervirulent clone, ST23. The major trajectories involved in horizontal gene transfer were IncFII and IncX3, IS26, and Tn3.

conclusionsThis is the largest study from an SA public hospital combining outcome, microbiology, and genomics. The findings indicate the urgent implementation of targeted diagnostics, appropriate antibiotic use, and infection-control interventions in SA public institutions.

Indexed as

Carbapenem-Resistant EnterobacteriaceaeEnterobacteriaceae InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAsia, SouthernBangladeshbeta-LactamasesCarbapenemsEscherichia coliGenomicsHumansKlebsiella pneumoniaeMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamasesCarbapenemsBangladeshcarbapenem-resistant Enterobacteralesoutbreakplasmid-mediated resistanceSouth Asia

Identifiers

PMID35412593
PMCPMC9825829
OpenAlexW4223443392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.