Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35412461›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2022

Development of the Socioeconomic Screening, Active Engagement, Follow-up, Education, Discharge Readiness, and Consistency (SAFEDC) Model for Improving Transitions of Care: Participatory Design.

Ji Youn Shin, Nkiru Okammor, Karly Hendee, Amber Pawlikowski, Grace Jenq, David Bozaan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ji Youn ShinDepartment of Media and Information, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4978-3897
Nkiru OkammorIntegrated Michigan Patient-Centered Alliance in Care Transitions (I-MPACT), Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1520-6610
Karly HendeeIntegrated Michigan Patient-Centered Alliance in Care Transitions (I-MPACT), Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3762-1973
Amber PawlikowskiSt. Joseph Mercy, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6014-6824
Grace JenqIntegrated Michigan Patient-Centered Alliance in Care Transitions (I-MPACT), Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1930-7235
David BozaanIntegrated Michigan Patient-Centered Alliance in Care Transitions (I-MPACT), Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2413-7509
Michigan Medicine · USMichigan State University · USTrinity Health Ann Arbor Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTransition to home after hospitalization involves the potential risk of adverse patient events, such as knowledge deficits related to self-care, medication errors, and readmissions. Despite broad organizational efforts to provide better care transitions for patients, there are challenges in implementing interventions that effectively improve care transition outcomes, as evidenced by readmission rates. Collaborative efforts that require health care professionals, patients, and caregivers to work together are necessary to identify gaps associated with transitions of care and generate effective transitional care interventions.

objectiveThis study aims to understand the usefulness of participatory design approaches in identifying the design implications of transition of care interventions in health care settings. Through a series of participatory design workshops, we have brought stakeholders of the health care system together. With a shared understanding of care transition and patient experience, we have provided participants with opportunities to generate possible design implications for care transitions.

methodsWe selected field observations in clinical settings and participatory design workshops to develop transitional care interventions that serve each hospital's unique situation and context. Patient journey maps were created and functioned as tools for creating a shared understanding of the discharge process across different stakeholders in the health care environment. The intervention sustainability was also assessed. By applying thematic analysis methods, we analyzed the problem statements and proposed interventions collected from participatory design workshops. The findings showed patterns of major discussion during the workshop.

resultsOn the basis of the workshop results, we formalized the transition of care model-the socioeconomic, active engagement, follow-up, education, discharge readiness tool, and consistency (Integrated Michigan Patient-centered Alliance in Care Transitions transition of care model)-which other organizations can apply to improve patient experiences in care transition. This model highlights the most significant themes that should necessarily be considered to improve the transition of care.

conclusionsOur study presents the benefits of the participatory design approach in defining the challenges associated with transitions of care related to patient discharge and generating sustainable interventions to improve care transitions.

Indexed as

care transitiondesigndischargeparticipatory designpatient-centered carereadmission

Identifiers

PMID35412461
PMCPMC9044161
OpenAlexW4223543530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.