Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35412227›Full record

Trial reportAdvances in therapy2022

Dosing Regimens of Intravitreal Aflibercept for Diabetic Macular Edema Beyond the First Year: VIOLET, a Prospective Randomized Trial.

Justus G Garweg, Jana Štefanickova, Carel Hoyng, Tobias Niesen, Thomas Schmelter, Sergio Leal, Sobha Sivaprasad, VIOLET Investigators

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Advances in therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02818998 (An Open-label, Randomized, Active-controlled, Parallel-group, Phase-3b Study of the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Three Different Treatment Regimens of 2 mg Aflibercept Administered by Intravitreal Injections to Subjects With Diabetic Macular Edema), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02818998 phase3completednot on this map

An Open-label, Randomized, Active-controlled, Parallel-group, Phase-3b Study of the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Three Different Treatment Regimens of 2 mg Aflibercept Administered by Intravitreal Injections to Subjects With Diabetic Macular Edema (DME)

TypeinterventionalSponsorBayerRan2016 to 2019Enrolled463ConditionsMacular EdemaArmsAflibercept (Eylea, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Justus G GarwegSwiss Eye Institute, Luzernerstrasse 1, 6343, Rotkreuz, Switzerland. justus.garweg@augenklinik-bern.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3973-5082
Jana ŠtefanickovaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Comenius University, University Hospital Ružinov, Ružinovská 4810/6, 821 01, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Carel HoyngDepartment of Ophthalmology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Tobias NiesenBayer AG, Kaiser-Wilhelm-Allee 3, 51373, Leverkusen, Germany.
Thomas SchmelterBayer AG, Müllerstraße 178, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Sergio LealBayer Consumer Care AG, Peter Merian-Strasse 84, 4052, Basel, Switzerland.
Sobha SivaprasadNIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Moorfields Eye Hospital, 162 City Rd, London, EC1V 2PD, UK.
VIOLET Investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe purpose was to compare two flexible regimens of intravitreal aflibercept (IVT-AFL) with fixed dosing every 8 weeks, beyond the first year of treatment, in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). VIOLET was a 100-week, randomized, Phase IIIb, non-inferiority study in patients with center-involving DME previously treated with IVT-AFL for ≥ 1 year according to the European label.

methodsPatients received an initial dose of IVT-AFL at study baseline and were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to treat-and-extend (T&E), pro re nata (PRN), or fixed regimens. The primary endpoint was mean change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline (randomization) to Week 52.

resultsFull analysis set comprised 458 patients (baseline mean BCVA: 72.5, 71.0, and 72.7 letters in the T&E, PRN, and fixed-dose groups, respectively). Patients received a mean (min-max) of 10.0 (2-14; T&E), 11.5 (1-25; PRN), and 12.3 (3-13; fixed) injections over 100 weeks, with 13.3 (4-23), 25.0 (3-29), and 16.1 (5-25) clinic visits, respectively. At Week 52, mean (± standard deviation) BCVA changes from baseline were + 0.5 ± 6.7 (T&E), + 1.7 ± 6.8 (PRN), and + 0.4 ± 6.7 (fixed-dosing) letters (least squares mean difference [95% confidence interval]: T&E 0.01 [- 1.46, 1.47] and PRN 0.95 (- 0.52, 2.42) letters versus fixed dosing; p < 0.0001 for both non-inferiority tests [4-letter margin]). The IVT-AFL safety profile was consistent with previous studies.

conclusionThe treatment burden associated with intravitreal injections for DME is lowest with T&E regimens, but there are a range of flexible IVT-AFL dosing regimens, allowing physicians to adopt an individualized treatment plan.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02818998.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusDiabetic RetinopathyMacular EdemaAngiogenesis InhibitorsHumansIntravitreal InjectionsProspective StudiesReceptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth FactorRecombinant Fusion ProteinsTreatment OutcomeVisual AcuityafliberceptAngiogenesis InhibitorsReceptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth FactorRecombinant Fusion ProteinsAfliberceptDiabetic retinopathyIntravitreal injectionsMacular edemaTreatment outcomeVascular endothelial growth factor

Identifiers

PMID35412227
PMCPMC9123040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.