ArticleIrish journal of medical science2023
Incidence of SARS-CoV-2 re-infection in anti-nucleocapsid IgG-positive healthcare workers: a prospective cohort study.
Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Nucleocapsid Antibodies as an Optimal Serological Marker of SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Longitudinal Study at the Thomayer University Hospital.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSince the pandemic of SARS-CoV-2 began, our understanding of the pathogenesis and immune responses to this virus has continued to evolve. It has been shown that this infection produces natural detectable immune responses in many cases. However, the duration and durability of immunity and its effect on the severity of the illness are still under investigation. Moreover, the protective effects of antibodies against new SARS-CoV-2 variants still remain unclear.
objectivesTo assess the incidence and associated demographic features of SARS-CoV-2 infection in anti-nucleocapsid IgG-positive and anti-nucleocapsid IgG-negative healthcare workers. MATERIAL AND
methodsThis prospective longitudinal cohort study was conducted in Peshawar Medical College group of hospitals of Prime Foundation. Anti-nucleocapsid IgG sero-positive and anti-nucleocapsid IgG sero-negative healthcare workers were followed for a period of 6 months (from 1 Aug 2020 to 31 Jan 2021), and the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 was confirmed by RT-PCR.
resultsA total number of 555 cohorts were followed for a period of 6 months; of them 365 (65.7%) were anti-nucleocapsid-negative (group A) and 190 (34.3%) were anti-nucleocapsid-positive (group B) healthcare workers. The mean age of the study cohort was 33.85 ± 9.80 (anti-N (-), 34.2 ± 10.58; anti-N ( +), 33.5 ± 9.50). The median antibody level in anti-nucleocapsid-positive HCWs was 15.95 (IQR: 5.24-53.4). Male gender was the majority in both groups (group A, 246 (67%), group B, 143 (48%)) with statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). Majority of the HCWs were blood group B in both groups (34% each). None of the 190 anti-nucleocapsid-positive HCWs developed subsequent SARS-CoV-2 re-infection, while 17% (n = 65) HCWs developed infection in anti-nucleocapsid-negative group during the 6-month follow-up period.
conclusionIn conclusion, none of the anti-nucleocapsid-positive HCWs developed SARS-CoV-2 re-infection in this study, and the presence of IgG anti-nucleocapsid antibodies substantially reduce the risk of re-infection for a period of 6 months.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.