ArticleJournal of gastroenterology2022
Evaluation of cholecystectomy in older individuals using real-world data: a multilevel analysis based on a nationwide administrative database in Japan.
Article in Journal of gastroenterology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Factors associated with conversion from day-case to in-patient elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery across England: an observational study using administrative data.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Observational
- Effectiveness of Blood Perfusion Assessment by Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Angiography in the Prevention of Anastomotic Leakage after Rectal Cancer Surgery in Japan: A Retrospective Study Using the Diagnosis Procedure Combination Database.Journal of the anus, rectum and colon · 2026Article
- Delayed Cholecystectomy After ERCP in Geriatric Patients: Balancing Surgical Risk and Recurrence Prevention - A Retrospective Study.Clinical interventions in aging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn the present study, we aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of cholecystectomy in older individuals.
methodsIn this retrospective study, data from the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database on 96,620 patients who had undergone cholecystectomy at 1060 hospitals from 2018 to 2020 were analyzed. Patients were divided into five age groups: < 75, 75-79, 80-84, 85-89, and ≥ 90 years. Associations between postoperative outcomes and age group were investigated by logistic regression analysis. Mean differences between age groups in time to postoperative recovery and cost were also compared.
resultsOlder patients had higher rates of poor scores for activities of daily living and preoperative comorbidity. Compared with the youngest age group (< 75 years), the odds ratios for in-hospital mortality were 3.00 (95% confidence interval, 1.74-5.19), 7.54 (4.73-12.01), 13.47 (8.21-22.14), and 27.64 (15.56-49.09), in the 75-79, 80-84, 85-89, and ≥ 90-year-old age group, respectively (all p < 0.001). Furthermore, the length of postoperative hospital stay and rates of postoperative complications, postoperative reintubation, and reoperation with general anesthesia increased significantly in parallel with increasing age, the highest rates being in the ≥ 90 year-old age group.
conclusionsOur real-world data highlight the worse postoperative outcomes, including a higher mortality rate, in older patients undergoing cholecystectomy. Care should be taken when considering the indications for surgery in such patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.