Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35412104›Full record

ReviewBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2022

[Specifics of risk and crisis communication in radiation protection and radiological emergency preparedness and response].

Christiane Pölzl-Viol

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Christiane Pölzl-ViolDO 4 Risikokommunikation und Wissensmanagement, Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, 85764, Oberschleißheim-Neuherberg, Deutschland. cpoelzl@bfs.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Forms of good risk and crisis communication in radiation protection must always be seen in relation to the societal handling of the different radiation topics about which the communication takes place. Risk and crisis communication are usually regarded as different communication disciplines. The article provides insight into the complexity of communication in the field of radiation protection in different contexts. Special characteristics of the respective form of communication and the possible uses of these forms of communication are described.

Indexed as

Civil DefenseRadiation ProtectionCommunicationGermanyCrisis communicationRadiation protectionRadiological emergency managementRisk communicationRisk perception

Identifiers

PMID35412104
PMCPMC9064848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.