Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35412097›Full record

ArticleScience and engineering ethics2022

Developing an Online Data Ethics Module Informed by an Ecology of Data Perspective.

Xiaofeng Tang, Eduardo Mendieta, Thomas A Litzinger

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Science and engineering ethics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xiaofeng TangInstitute of Education, Tsinghua University, 327 Wennan Building, Haidian District, 100084, Beijing, China. denvertang@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-6279-9941
Eduardo MendietaDepartment of Philosophy, The Pennsylvania State University, 129A Sparks Building, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0903-885X
Thomas A LitzingerDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and The Leonhard Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Education, The Pennsylvania State University, 201 Hammond Building, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A self-perceived lack of training in ethical theories and related pedagogy has kept many engineering faculty members from teaching data ethics, an important aspect of engineering research that has become more salient in recent years. This paper describes the development of a module, which includes concepts, cases, policies, and best practices, to support the teaching of ethical data practice. Based on a user-oriented design approach and a moral literacy framework, the module was designed to be used in different courses and co-curricular activities for students of varying levels of competence to improve their ability to identify and analyze ethical problems associated with the handling of research data. This work seeks to encourage ethical reflection on researchers' data practice through the idea of an "ecology of data," which highlights the co-production of data by multiple, interconnected, and heterogeneous actors. This paper also presents online and in-class evidence about the impact and limitations of the module, which is now available for interested researchers and instructors to browse and use.

Indexed as

EngineeringEthical TheoryCurriculumHumansMoralsStudentsData ethicsEngineering ethics educationEthical reasoningEthics moduleInstructional designResearch ethics

Identifiers

PMID35412097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.