ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2022
Cost-Effectiveness of Monitoring Patients Post-Stroke With Mobile ECG During the Hospital Stay.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness of Nurse-Led atrial Fibrillation Detection for Patients With Embolic Stroke of Unknown Source in Stroke Units: A Retrospective Study.Nursing in critical care · 2026Article
- Digital Health-Enabled Monitoring Strategies for Atrial Fibrillation Detection after Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Implantable Loop Recorders, Wearable Devices, and Usual Care.Cerebrovascular diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Validation of a New and Straightforward Algorithm to Evaluate Signal Quality during ECG Monitoring with Wearable Devices Used in a Clinical Setting.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 10 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The effectiveness of a nurse-led in-hospital monitoring protocol with mobile ECG (iECG) was investigated for detecting atrial fibrillation in patients post-ischemic stroke or post-transient ischemic attack. The study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of using iECG during the initial hospital stay compared with standard 24-hour Holter monitoring. Methods and Results A Markov microsimulation model was constructed to simulate the lifetime health outcomes and costs. The rate of atrial fibrillation detection in iECG and Holter monitoring during the in-hospital phase and characteristics of modeled population (ie, age, sex, CHA2DS2-VASc) were informed by patient-level data. Costs related to recurrent stroke, stroke management, medications (new oral anticoagulants), and rehabilitation were included. The cost-effectiveness analysis outcome was calculated as an incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained. As results, monitoring patients with iECG post-stroke during the index hospitalization was associated with marginally higher costs (A$31 196) and greater benefits (6.70 quality-adjusted life-years) compared with 24-hour Holter surveillance (A$31 095 and 6.66 quality-adjusted life-years) over a 20-year time horizon, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $3013/ quality-adjusted life-years. Monitoring patients with iECG also contributed to lower recurrence of stroke and stroke-related deaths (140 recurrent strokes and 20 deaths avoided per 10 000 patients). The probabilistic sensitivity analyses suggested iECG is highly likely to be a cost-effective intervention (100% probability). Conclusions A nurse-led iECG monitoring protocol during the acute hospital stay was found to improve the rate of atrial fibrillation detection and contributed to slightly increased costs and improved health outcomes. Using iECG to monitor patients post-stroke during initial hospitalization is recommended to complement routine care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.