Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35411709›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2022

A codevelopment process to advance methods for the use of patient-reported outcome measures and patient-reported experience measures with people who are homeless and experience chronic illness.

Erin E Donald, Kara Whitlock, Tracy Dansereau, Daniel J Sands, David Small, Kelli I Stajduhar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Disrupting patterns of exclusion in participatory spaces: Involving people from vulnerable populations.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Erin E DonaldInstitute on Aging and Lifelong Health, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7343-5465
Kara WhitlockInstitute on Aging and Lifelong Health, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8963-6202
Tracy Dansereau
Daniel J Sands
David Small
Kelli I StajduharInstitute on Aging and Lifelong Health, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2381-4712
University of Victoria · CA

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPeople who experience social disadvantage including homelessness suffer from numerous ill health effects when compared to the general public. Use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) enables collection of information from the point of view of the person receiving care. Involvement in research and health care decision-making, a process that can be facilitated by the use of PROMs and PREMs, is one way to promote equity in care.

methodsThis article reports on a codevelopment and consultation study investigating the use of PROMs and PREMs with people who experience homelessness and chronic illness. Data were analysed according to interpretative phenomenological analysis.

resultsCommittee members with lived experience identified three themes for the role of PROMs and PREMs in health care measurement: trust and relationship-building; health and quality of life; and equity, alongside specific recommendations for the design and administration of PROMs and PREMs. The codevelopment process is reported to demonstrate the meaningful investment in time, infrastructure and relationship-building required for successful partnership between researchers and people with lived experience of homelessness.

conclusionPROMs and PREMs can be meaningful measurement tools for people who experience social disadvantage, but can be alienating or reproduce inequity if they fail to capture complexity or rely on hidden assumptions of key concepts. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This study was conducted in active partnership between researchers and people with experience of homelessness and chronic illness, including priority setting for study design, data construction, analysis and coauthorship on this article.

Indexed as

Ill-Housed PersonsQuality of LifeChronic DiseaseDelivery of Health CareHumansPatient Reported Outcome Measureshealth equityhomelesshomelessnesspatient-oriented researchpatient-reported outcomessubstance use

Identifiers

PMID35411709
PMCPMC9615092
OpenAlexW4223478164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.