Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35411697›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2022

Codesigning a patient support portal with health professionals and men with prostate cancer: An action research study.

Benjamin Shemesh, Jacinta Opie, Ellie Tsiamis, Darshini Ayton, Prassannah Satasivam, Paula Wilton, Karla Gough, Katrina Lewis, Colin O'Brien, Max Shub and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Developing, Piloting and Evaluating a Patient Support Portal for Men With Prostate Cancer in Victoria: An Action Research Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Codesigning a patient support portal with health professionals and men with prostate cancer: An action research study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Benjamin ShemeshSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1710-7587
Jacinta OpieSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7020-3837
Ellie TsiamisSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8006-7958
Darshini AytonSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2754-2024
Prassannah SatasivamDepartment of Surgery, Northern Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5825-3612
Paula WiltonThe Victorian Agency for Health Information (VAHI), Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6100-4847
Karla GoughHealth Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2819-4217
Katrina LewisPatient Experience and Consumer Participation, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4672-8657
Colin O'BrienSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Max ShubSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Amanda PomeryMovember, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3565-5931
Christopher Mac ManusHelix, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7643-6706
Jeremy MillarSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8202-8602
Susan EvansSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2962-8400
Monash University · AUAlfred Health · AUCancer Council Victoria · AUMovember Foundation · AUPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUVictorian Aboriginal Health Service · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe supportive care needs of men with prostate cancer (PCa) have been well documented, but little is known about how an online portal may address these. This study sought to determine priority issues facing men with PCa, barriers and enablers to accessing care and whether health professionals (HPs) and men would support the inclusion of a patient-reported outcome (PRO) comparator tool.

methodsWe conducted four online focus groups with HPs recruited from healthcare services in Victoria, followed by seven online codesign workshops with men with PCa, recruited through the Victorian Prostate Cancer Outcomes Registry, Prostate Cancer Foundation Australia and the Cancer Council Victoria. Men were eligible to participate if they had lived experience of PCa and access to the internet. We analysed focus groups thematically. Workshops were analysed using descriptive-content analysis.

resultsHPs (n = 39) highlighted that men had shifting priorities over time, but noted the importance of providing information to men in lay terms to assist in treatment decision-making and side-effect management. HPs identified key enablers to men accessing support services such as practice nurses, partners and having men share their stories with each other. HPs raised financial, cultural, geographic and emotional barriers to accessing supportive care. Inclusion of a PRO comparator tool received mixed support from HPs, with 41% (n = 16) supportive, 49% (n = 19) unsure and 10% (n = 4) not supportive. Men involved in workshops (n = 28) identified informational needs to assist in treatment decision-making and side-effect management as the top priority throughout care. Men described support groups and practice nurses as key enablers. Short consultation times and complex information were described as barriers. Unlike HPs, all men supported the inclusion of a PRO comparator tool in a portal.

conclusionsOur findings suggest that a patient support portal should provide information in lay terms that address the shifting priorities of men with PCa. Men with PCa would welcome the development of a portal to centralize support information and a PRO comparator tool to prompt health-seeking behaviour. Future research will implement these findings in the development of a portal, and pilot and evaluate the portal within a population-based sample. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This project adopted a codesign approach including both men with PCa and HPs involved in PCa care. Men with PCa also formed part of the study's steering committee and consumer advisory groups. HPs were consulted in a serious of online focus groups. Subsequently, men with PCa and their support persons participated in workshops. Men with PCa were also involved in the preparation of this manuscript.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelProstatic NeoplasmsFocus GroupsHealth Services ResearchHumansMaleVictoriaaction research studycodesignpatient-reported outcomesprostate cancersupport portal

Identifiers

PMID35411697
PMCPMC9327875
OpenAlexW4223620082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.