Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35411609›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2022

Peripheral blood lymphocytes subtypes as new predictors for neoadjuvant therapy efficacy in breast cancer.

Jikun Feng, Jiarong Yi, Xiazi Zouxu, Jianxia Li, Zhenchong Xiong, Xinjian Huang, Wenjing Zhong, Weiling Huang, Feng Ye, Xi Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jikun FengDepartment of Breast Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7964-9624
Jiarong YiDepartment of Breast Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Xiazi ZouxuDepartment of Breast Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Jianxia LiDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Zhenchong XiongDepartment of Breast Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1129-5663
Xinjian HuangDepartment of Breast Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Wenjing ZhongDepartment of Breast Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Weiling HuangDepartment of Breast Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Feng YeDepartment of Breast Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9029-1574
Xi WangDepartment of Breast Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHost immunity plays an important role in tumor development and treatment. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) have been proven to predict the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in breast cancer (BC) patients, but their application is limited due to various reasons. This study aims to explore the relationship between peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs) subsets distribution and the efficacy of NAT.

methodsBetween December 2017 and March 2021, a total of 116 BC patients appropriate for NAT in Sun Yat-Sen University cancer center were enrolled, pre-NAC baseline blood samples were taken for further flow cytometry analysis to quantitatively evaluate the PBLs subsets distribution, and corresponding clinical information including pathological complete response (pCR) rate of NAT response were recorded.

resultsBaseline CD3+ T cells(OR 1.11, 1.03-1.21, p = 0.011), CD8+ T cells (OR 1.09, 1.02-1.18, p = 0.015), and NK cells (OR 0.91, 0.83-0.98, p = 0.028) in PBLs subgroup distribution were independent predictors of pCR in BC patients receiving NAT, in which CD8+ T cells had the highest predictive ability (AUC = 0.76). Compared with some previous prediction indicators, its prediction ability has been improved to some extent.

conclusionPeripheral baseline CD3+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, and NK cells were independent predictors of pCR in BC patients receiving NAT, in which CD8+ T cells had the highest predictive ability. Therefore, it can provide newly non-invasive, relatively accurate and easily accessible predictors for corresponding patients, and help clinicians better understand tumor immunity.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsNeoadjuvant TherapyCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesFemaleHumansKiller Cells, NaturalLymphocytes, Tumor-Infiltratingbreast cancerindependent predictorsneoadjuvant therapyPBLs subtypes

Identifiers

PMID35411609
PMCPMC9359876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.