ArticleBehavior research methods2023
Factors affecting inter-rater agreement in human classification of eye movements: a comparison of three datasets.
Article in Behavior research methods, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hyperparameter tuning using Lévy flight and interactive crossover-based reptile search algorithm for eye movement event classification.Frontiers in physiology · 2024Article
- What can entropy metrics tell us about the characteristics of ocular fixation trajectories?PloS one · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Manual classification of eye-movements is used in research and as a basis for comparison with automatic algorithms in the development phase. However, human classification will not be useful if it is unreliable and unrepeatable. Therefore, it is important to know what factors might influence and enhance the accuracy and reliability of human classification of eye-movements. In this report we compare three datasets of human manual classification, two from earlier datasets and one, our own dataset, which we present here for the first time. For inter-rater reliability, we assess both the event-level F1-score and sample-level Cohen's κ, across groups of raters. The report points to several possible influences on human classification reliability: eye-tracker quality, use of head restraint, characteristics of the recorded subjects, the availability of detailed scoring rules, and the characteristics and training of the raters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.