ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2022
Impact of antithrombotic agents on short-term outcomes following minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery: a propensity score-matched analysis.
Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIt remains unclear whether minimally invasive colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery under the suitable management of perioperative antithrombotic therapy (ATT) is safe and feasible in patients treated with chronic ATT. The present study aimed to assess the impact of ATT on short-term outcomes following minimally invasive CRC surgery.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 1495 consecutive patients who underwent elective minimally invasive CRC surgery between 2011 and 2021, using propensity score-matched analysis.
resultsOverall, 230 patients had chronically received ATT. After propensity score matching, we enrolled 412 patients (n = 206 in each group). Before matching, significant group-dependent differences were observed in terms of sex (p < 0.01), age (p < 0.01), American Society of Anesthesiologists' physical status (p < 0.01), body mass index (p < 0.01), and pathological N classification (p = 0.03). The frequencies of overall postoperative complications, bleeding events, and thromboembolic events were significantly higher in the ATT group than in the Non-ATT group (p < 0.01). After matching, no significant differences were found between the groups in terms of clinical or surgical characteristics, or in terms of the frequency of overall postoperative complications, bleeding events, thromboembolic events, length of postoperative stay, or any other postoperative complication. Multivariate analysis identified no significant risk factors for postoperative bleeding events or severe postoperative complications associated with ATT.
conclusionsPatients treated with chronic ATT showed acceptable short-term outcomes for minimally invasive CRC surgery compared with those not receiving ATT. Minimally invasive CRC surgery appears safe and feasible under the suitable management of perioperative ATT regardless of whether the patient has a history of ATT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35411471What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.