Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35411467›Full record

ReviewSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2022

How technology can improve communication and health outcomes in patients with advanced cancer: an integrative review.

Natasha Ansari, Christina M Wilson, Mallorie B Heneghan, Kathie Supiano, Kathi Mooney

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. TheWestern journal of nursing research · 2025
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Natasha AnsariCollege of Nursing, University of Utah, 10 South 2000, East Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA. natasha.ansari@utah.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5516-4537
Christina M WilsonSchool of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1701 University Blvd, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA.
Mallorie B HeneghanDivision of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, University of Utah, 100 Mario Capecchi Dr, Salt Lake City, UT, 84113, USA.
Kathie SupianoCollege of Nursing, University of Utah, 10 South 2000, East Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
Kathi MooneyCollege of Nursing, University of Utah, 10 South 2000, East Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePatients facing an advanced cancer diagnosis require clear communication with their clinicians. Technology has been utilized in many different capacities to navigate communication in cancer care, but few authors examine the specific areas of communication from a theoretical perspective. The purpose of this literature review was to (1) identify articles focused on technology-based communication strategies to improve health outcomes in individuals with advanced cancer, and (2) using Epstein and Street's framework, identify areas in which technology-based communication has been used to improve health outcomes, and (3) identify gaps that exist in technology-based communication care in patients with advanced cancer.

methodsA systematic search was conducted which returned 446 articles. Using Epstein and Street's 2007 framework, the final sample was 39.

resultsNine clinical trials, 29 observational studies, and 1 case study were identified. The articles were categorized into one area within Epstein and Street's areas of communication. Many of the articles examined the patient's and provider's acceptability and feasibility of technology-based methods of communication, while other articles examined their efficacy.

conclusionsWhile research studies were identified in each of the areas of communication, the majority of technology-based communication strategies were focused on the exchange of information between patients and their providers. Further research and the development of technology-based communication interventions assessed through clinical trials are needed in the areas of healing relationships and making decisions in cancer care. Additionally, the communication strategies found effective at improving health outcomes in advanced cancer should begin implementation into clinical practice, therefore reaching more patients.

Indexed as

CommunicationNeoplasmsDecision MakingHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CareTechnologyCancereHealthInternetPalliativeTechnologyTelemedicine

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.