Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35411452›Full record

ArticleObesity surgery2022

Is Sleeve Gastrectomy as Effective in Older Patients as in Younger Patients? A Comparative Analysis of Weight Loss, Related Comorbidities, and Medication Requirements.

Sonia Fernández-Ananín, Eulalia Ballester, Berta Gonzalo, Claudia Codina, Inka Miñambres, Antonio Pérez, Ignasi J Gich, Sandra González, Cristina Serrano, Carmen Balagué

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sonia Fernández-AnanínUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Medical School, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital de La Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain. sfernandeza@santpau.cat.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5068-1954
Eulalia BallesterUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Medical School, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital de La Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
Berta GonzaloUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Medical School, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital de La Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
Claudia CodinaUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Medical School, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital de La Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
Inka MiñambresFunctional Unit of Bariatric & Metabolic Surgery, Hospital de La Santa Creu I Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Medical School, Barcelona, Spain.
Antonio PérezFunctional Unit of Bariatric & Metabolic Surgery, Hospital de La Santa Creu I Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Medical School, Barcelona, Spain.
Ignasi J GichDepartment of Epidemiology, Hospital de La Santa Creu I Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Medical School, Barcelona, Spain.
Sandra GonzálezUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Medical School, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital de La Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
Cristina SerranoFunctional Unit of Bariatric & Metabolic Surgery, Hospital de La Santa Creu I Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Medical School, Barcelona, Spain.
Carmen BalaguéUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Medical School, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital de La Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBariatric surgery in the older population has been the subject of ongoing debate but several studies have recently demonstrated its short-term advantages in this age group. It is not yet clear, however, whether these benefits are long-lasting.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed patients with morbid obesity who underwent laparoscopy sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). These patients were divided into two groups: those above 60 years of age (older group) and those of 60 years or under (younger group). Variables evaluated included demographics and anthropometrics data, comorbidities, and daily medication requirements.

resultsTwo hundred fifty-two patients underwent LSG, 57 in the older group and 195 in the younger group. Outcomes related to weight loss in the older subjects were modest compared to those in the younger population (older group %EWL 41.6 vs younger group %EWL 51.1, p < 0.05, older group %TWL 24.9% vs younger group %TWL 25.2%, p < 0.05). During follow-up, both older and younger patients showed an improvement in all the comorbidities: hypertension (older 82.5% vs 38.1%, younger 52.6% vs 29.2%, p < 0.05), type 2 diabetes mellitus (older 38.6% vs 27.3%, 34.9% vs 23.9%, p < 0.05), hyperlipidemia (older 75.4% vs 42.9%, younger 35.9% vs 21.1%, p < 0.05), and OSAHS (older 57.9% vs 30%, younger 40.4% vs 7.1%, p < 0.05). The average number of daily medications used to manage comorbidities decreased in both groups.

conclusionLSG in older patients is effective in terms of weight loss, improvement of comorbidities, and lower daily medication requirements up to 5 years of follow-up.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2LaparoscopyObesity, MorbidAgedGastrectomyHumansMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeWeight LossBariatric surgeryComorbiditiesMetabolic surgeryMorbid obesityOlder patientsSleeve gastrectomy

Identifiers

PMID35411452
PMCPMC9072441
OpenAlexW4223496322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.