ReviewInternational orthopaedics2022
Is the risk of periprosthetic joint infection in patients undergoing total hip and knee joint arthroplasty in the multi-unit operating room higher than in the classical single-unit operating room?
Review in International orthopaedics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study was performed to answer the question: Is the risk of PJI in patients undergoing primary TKA and THA in multi-unit OR higher than in a classical single-unit OR? We hypothesized that the risk of PJI following TKA and THA is not associated with the OR type.
methodsWe reviewed the medical records of all cases of THA and TKA in our centre, between January 2015 and September 2018, in our single- and multi-unit OR. A total of 8674 patients met the inclusion criteria. Patients were divided into two groups: group 1, surgery in the multi-unit OR (n = 8282); group 2, surgery in the single-unit OR (n = 450). The infection rate between both groups was compared using chi-square test.
resultsThere was no significant difference between both groups regarding the septic revision rate at three (p = 0.1 and 0.58 respectively) and six months post-operatively (p = 0.22 and 0.7 respectively). In group 1, five patients after TKA and 4 patients after THA were revised within three months. At six months, 11 patients after TKA and six patients after THA required revision surgery. In group 2, one patient after TKA and one patient after THA were revised within three months. At six months, one patient after TKA and one patient after THA underwent revision surgery.
conclusionThe incidence of SSI does not differ significantly based on OR design in patients undergoing TKA and THA. The number of patients per surgical table in multi-unit OR is higher than in the single-unit OR. This shows that more number of surgeries can be achieved in multi-unit OR and as safe as single-unit OR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35411435What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.