ReviewCureus2022
Clinical Outcome of Neonates Born to SARS-CoV-2 Positive Mothers in India: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of COVID-19 on Pregnancy and Neonate's Vital Parameters: A Systematic Review.Journal of pregnancy · 2023Pooled it
- Management of neonates with maternal prenatal coronavirus infection and influencing factors.Pediatric research · 2024Review
- Neonatal outcomes of maternal prenatal coronavirus infection.Pediatric research · 2024Review
- Retrospective Analysis of the Impact of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) on Pregnancy and Neonatal Outcomes.Journal of pregnancy · 2024Article
- Comparative Analysis of Hematological and Biochemical Changes in Neonates among Women with and without COVID-19 Infection during Pregnancy.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, India accounted for 10-50% of cases reported across the world. Perinatal care from a developing country during this period has its own importance. This study was conducted to evaluate the health outcome of neonates born to SARS-CoV-2 positive mothers in India from the published literature by a systematic review and meta-analysis. Articles reporting neonates born from SARS-CoV-2 confirmed mothers in India, published in PubMed, Scopus®, and Embase® databases, were analyzed. After registration with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO), the study was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The primary outcomes were the mode of delivery, perinatal asphyxia, preterm birth, breastfeeding, neonatal mortality, SARS-CoV-2 infectivity among neonates of SARS-CoV-2 mothers. The pooled rate was expressed with a 95% confidence interval. Heterogeneity and study level effect size were assessed using I² statistics and DerSimonian and Laird random effect method of meta-analysis. Data analysis was made by Stata 15.1 (StataCorp LLC, College Station, Texas, USA). Total 3,551 neonates born from 3,542 SARS-CoV-2 positive mothers were included from 14 studies (four prospective and 10 retrospective studies). The pooled rates of premature birth, Caesarean delivery, breastfeeding, and neonatal mortality were 18.89%, 55.89%, 67.79%, respectively, with 12.64/1000 live births. SARS-CoV-2 positivity rate was 5.28%; 11.76% were symptomatic, and five (1.7%) died from 281 SARS-CoV-2 positive neonates. There was an increase in the number of Caesarean delivery, premature birth, and lower mortality among neonates born to SARS-CoV-2 positive mothers compared to the Indian neonatal database. Around five percent of neonates delivered to SARS-CoV-2 positive mothers were infected, and the majority of them had good clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.