Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35411226›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2022

Improving the detection of aggressive prostate cancer using immunohistochemical staining of protein marker panels.

Qing Kay Li, Tung-Shing Mamie Lih, Yuefan Wang, Yingwei Hu, Naseruddin Höti, Daniel W Chan, Hui Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of cancer research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Qing Kay LiDepartment of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
Tung-Shing Mamie LihDepartment of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
Yuefan WangDepartment of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
Yingwei HuDepartment of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
Naseruddin HötiDepartment of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
Daniel W ChanDepartment of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
Hui ZhangDepartment of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.

Funding

Glycoprotein biomarkers for the early detection of aggressive prostate cancerU01CA152813 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ZHANG, HUI · 2010 to 2021
$6.2M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA152813
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prostate cancer (PCa) is a heterogeneous group of tumors, including non-aggressive (NAG) and aggressive (AG) cancer, with variable clinical outcomes. Clinically, in order to assess the aggressiveness of a PCa, a core needle biopsy of a tumor is usually obtained to evaluate the Gleason pattern and score of the tumor. However, it may be difficult to assign on a small biopsy sample using histology. Therefore, additional tool is needed to aid in the assessment. We studied the diagnostic utility of 12 protein markers to identify AG tumors using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and tumor tissue microarray (TMA), including 215 cores of PCa and 111 cores of tumor-matched normal adjacent tissue (NAT). Protein markers were evaluated for their potential utility as single or combined panels for identification of AG. Of 12 proteins, PSMA, phospho-EGFR, AR and P16 were over-expressed in AG. Galectin-3, DPP4 and MAN1B1 revealed stronger staining patterns in NAG. The sensitivity and specificity of individual marker varied widely. Based on AUC values of individual marker, we constructed two- and three-marker panels. In two-marker panels, especially in the panel of DPP4 and PSMA, the AUC value reached 0.83 (ranging from 0.76 to 0.83). In three-marker panels, containing both DPP4 and PSMA with either Galectin-3 or phospho-EGFR, the AUC value reached 0.86 (ranging from 0.83 to 0.86). The specificities at 95% sensitivity of three-marker panels were also significantly improved. In addition to Gleason score, our IHC panels provide a practical tool to assess the aggressiveness of PCa.

Indexed as

aggressive prostate cancerimmunohistochemistryProstate cancerprotein markerstumor tissue microarray

Identifiers

PMID35411226
PMCPMC8984898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.