ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2022
Estimating VO
Article in International journal of general medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Article
- Long-term lifestyle monitoring adherence in patients after cardiac intervention: a prospective observational trial.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Article
- Multimodal Prehabilitation for Colorectal Cancer Patients: Study Protocol of a Nationwide Multicentre Study With Uniform Prehabilitation Protocols.World journal of surgery · 2025Article
- Patient-reported questionnaires to preoperatively identify high-risk surgical patients.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2024Article
- Criterion Validity of Screening Tools and Field-Based Tests for Health-Related Physical Fitness in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2024Article
- Test-retest reliability of the FitMáx©-questionnaire in a clinical and healthy population.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2024Observational
- VO2MAX, 6-minute walk, and muscle strength each correlate with frailty in US veterans.Frontiers in physiology · 2024Article
- Telerehabilitation in patients with recent hospitalisation due to acute decompensated heart failure: protocol for the Tele-ADHF randomised controlled trial.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2023Article
- Multimodal prehabilitation in patients with non-small cell lung cancer undergoing anatomical resection: protocol of a non-randomised feasibility study.Perioperative medicine (London, England) · 2023Article
- Monitoring aerobic capacity in cancer survivors using self-reported questionnaires: criterion validity and responsiveness.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2023Article
- Adherence to a lifestyle monitoring system in patients with heart disease: protocol for the care-on prospective observational trial.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2023Article
- Usefulness of the Duke Activity Status Index to Assess Exercise Capacity and Predict Risk Stratification in Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) plays an essential role in health outcomes and quality of life. However, it is often not assessed nor estimated. Objective CRF assessment is costly, labour intensive and not widely available. Patient-reported outcome measures estimate CRF more cost-efficiently, but current questionnaires lack accuracy. The aim of this study is to develop a new self-reported questionnaire to estimate CRF. Materials and Methods: The FitMáx©-questionnaire, consisting of only three questions assessing walking, stair climbing, and cycling capacity, was compared with the commonly used Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) and Veterans Specific Activity Questionnaire (VSAQ). These questionnaires were compared to peak oxygen uptake (VO Results: FitMáx© strongly correlated (r = 0.94 (0.92‒0.95) SEE = 4.14 mL∙kg Conclusion: FitMáx© is a valid and accessible questionnaire to estimate CRF expressed as VO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.