Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35411120›Full record

ArticleOptik2022

ETL-YOLO v4: A face mask detection algorithm in era of COVID-19 pandemic.

Akhil Kumar, Arvind Kalia, Aayushi Kalia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Optik, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A Review on Face Mask Recognition.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Akhil KumarDepartment of Computer Science, Himachal Pradesh University, Shimla, India.
Arvind KaliaDepartment of Computer Science, Himachal Pradesh University, Shimla, India.
Aayushi KaliaCSED, Thapar Institute of Engineering & Technology, Patiala, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the last two years, several deep learning-based methods for face mask detection have been proposed by researchers. However, most of the proposed methods struggle with the detection of face masks that are too small an object to detect and further achieve low detection accuracy. Considering the issues of the existing methods, in this work, we have proposed ETL-YOLO v4 with a modified and improved feature extraction and prediction network for tiny YOLO v4 which surpasses all its predecessors and other related work in the literature. To develop ETL-YOLO v4, we have improved the backbone architecture of tiny YOLO v4 by adding a modified-dense SPP network, two additional detection layers with modified and optimized CNN layers that aid in accurate prediction, used Mish as the activation function, and utilized modified anchor boxes. Furthermore, to obtain detection results in images of varied viewpoints, we have added Mosaic and CutMix data augmentation at training time. The proposed ETL-YOLO v4 achieved 9.93% higher mAP, 5.75% higher average precision (AP) for faces with masks, and 16.6% higher average precision (AP) for the face mask region as compared to its original base-line variant.

Indexed as

COVID-19Face mask detectionMish activationSPP networkTiny YOLO v4

Identifiers

PMID35411120
PMCPMC8986544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.