Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35411063›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Nephrology2022

Drosophila melanogaster: a simple genetic model of kidney structure, function and disease.

Julian A T Dow, Matias Simons, Michael F Romero

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Nephrology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Power of Drosophila in Modeling Cancer Cachexia.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  11. Paraneoplastic renal dysfunction in fly cancer models driven by inflammatory activation of stem cells.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Modelling phenotypes, variants and pathomechanisms of syndromic diseases in different systems.Medizinische Genetik : Mitteilungsblatt des Berufsverbandes Medizinische Genetik e.V · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Julian A T DowInstitute of Molecular, Cell and Systems Biology, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK. Julian.Dow@glasgow.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9595-5146
Matias SimonsINSERM UMR1163, Laboratory of Epithelial Biology and Disease, Imagine Institute, Université de Paris, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3959-6350
Michael F RomeroDepartment of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1555-7835
Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades · FRMayo Clinic · USUniversity of Glasgow · GB

Funding

Pilot and FeasibilityP30DK090728 · NIDDK · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI TORRES, VICENTE E · 2010 to 2019
$11.8M
VISUALIZATION AND PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF RENAL STONE PRECURSOR LESIONSU54DK100227 · NIDDK · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI RULE, ANDREW DAVID · 2013 to 2017
$6.3M
Mayo Clinic Summer Undergraduate Research in Nephrology & UrologyR25DK101405 · NIDDK · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI MICHAEL F. ROMERO · 2014 to 2026
$1.6M
Drosophila model of oxalate nephrolithiasisR01DK092408 · NIDDK · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI DOW, JULIAN ALEXANDER, ROMERO, MICHAEL F. · 2012 to 2015
$837k
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilNIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK090728NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK092408NIDDK NIH HHS R25 DK101405NIDDK NIH HHS U54 DK100227
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the genetic basis of many kidney diseases is being rapidly elucidated, their experimental study remains problematic owing to the lack of suitable models. The fruitfly Drosophila melanogaster provides a rapid, ethical and cost-effective model system of the kidney. The unique advantages of D. melanogaster include ease and low cost of maintenance, comprehensive availability of genetic mutants and powerful transgenic technologies, and less onerous regulation, as compared with mammalian systems. Renal and excretory functions in D. melanogaster reside in three main tissues - the transporting renal (Malpighian) tubules, the reabsorptive hindgut and the endocytic nephrocytes. Tubules contain multiple cell types and regions and generate a primary urine by transcellular transport rather than filtration, which is then subjected to selective reabsorption in the hindgut. By contrast, the nephrocytes are specialized for uptake of macromolecules and equipped with a filtering slit diaphragm resembling that of podocytes. Many genes with key roles in the human kidney have D. melanogaster orthologues that are enriched and functionally relevant in fly renal tissues. This similarity has allowed investigations of epithelial transport, kidney stone formation and podocyte and proximal tubule function. Furthermore, a range of unique quantitative phenotypes are available to measure function in both wild type and disease-modelling flies.

Indexed as

Drosophila ProteinsKidney CalculiAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterHumansKidneyMammalsModels, GeneticDrosophila Proteins

Identifiers

PMID35411063
OpenAlexW4223460243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.