Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35410997›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Latency shortening with enhanced sparseness and responsiveness in V1 during active visual sensing.

Junji Ito, Cristian Joana, Yukako Yamane, Ichiro Fujita, Hiroshi Tamura, Pedro E Maldonado, Sonja Grün

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Eye Movement-Related Eardrum Oscillations (EMREOs) Occur without Visual Input But Are Reduced during Closed Eyelids.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Junji ItoInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-6, INM-10) and Institute for Advanced Simulation (IAS-6) and JARA BRAIN Institute I, Jülich Research Centre, Wilhelm-Johnen Str., 52425, Jülich, Germany. j.ito@fz-juelich.de.ORCID 0000-0001-9170-4422
Cristian JoanaInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-6, INM-10) and Institute for Advanced Simulation (IAS-6) and JARA BRAIN Institute I, Jülich Research Centre, Wilhelm-Johnen Str., 52425, Jülich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4642-3028
Yukako YamaneGraduate School of Frontier Biosciences, Osaka University, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3348-1942
Ichiro FujitaGraduate School of Frontier Biosciences, Osaka University, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3293-8610
Hiroshi TamuraGraduate School of Frontier Biosciences, Osaka University, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Pedro E MaldonadoDepartment of Neuroscience and Biomedical Neuroscience Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.ORCID 0000-0001-9895-7684
Sonja GrünInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-6, INM-10) and Institute for Advanced Simulation (IAS-6) and JARA BRAIN Institute I, Jülich Research Centre, Wilhelm-Johnen Str., 52425, Jülich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2829-2220

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In natural vision, neuronal responses to visual stimuli occur due to self-initiated eye movements. Here, we compare single-unit activity in the primary visual cortex (V1) of non-human primates to flashed natural scenes (passive vision condition) to when they freely explore the images by self-initiated eye movements (active vision condition). Active vision enhances the number of neurons responding, and the response latencies become shorter and less variable across neurons. The increased responsiveness and shortened latency during active vision were not explained by increased visual contrast. While the neuronal activities in all layers of V1 show enhanced responsiveness and shortened latency, a significant increase in lifetime sparseness during active vision is observed only in the supragranular layer. These findings demonstrate that the neuronal responses become more distinct in active vision than passive vision, interpreted as consequences of top-down predictive mechanisms.

Indexed as

Visual CortexAnimalsEye MovementsPhotic StimulationVision, OcularVisual Perception

Identifiers

PMID35410997
PMCPMC9001710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.