Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35410932›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

A cross-sectional examination of conflict-of-interest disclosures of physician-authors publishing in high-impact US medical journals.

James H Baraldi, Steven A Picozzo, Jacob C Arnold, Kathryn Volarich, Michael R Gionfriddo, Brian J Piper

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Disclosure of Industry Relationships by Otolaryngologists.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

James H BaraldiDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA psy391@gmail.com james.baraldi@pitt.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6312-3812
Steven A PicozzoDepartment of Medical Education, Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Scranton, Pennsylvania, USA.
Jacob C ArnoldDepartment of Medical Education, Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Scranton, Pennsylvania, USA.
Kathryn VolarichDepartment of Medical Education, Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Scranton, Pennsylvania, USA.
Michael R GionfriddoSchool of Pharmacy, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Brian J PiperSchool of Pharmacy, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA psy391@gmail.com james.baraldi@pitt.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2295-445X

Funding

MODE OF ACTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICANTST32ES007060 · NIEHS · OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Jamie DeWitt, Siva Kumar Kolluri · 1985 to 2026
$11.6M
NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES007060
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the accuracy of self-reported financial conflict-of-interest (COI) disclosures in the

designCross-sectional investigation. DATA SOURCES: Original clinical-trial research articles published in

main outcome measuresFinancial data reported to Open Payments from 2014 to 2016 (a time period that included all subjects' requisite disclosure windows) were compared with self-reported disclosure forms submitted to the journals. Payments selected for analysis were defined by Open Payments as 'general payments.' Payment types were categorised as 'disclosed,' 'undisclosed,' 'indeterminate' or 'unrelated'.

resultsThirty-one articles from

conclusionsHigh payment amounts, as well as high proportions of undisclosed financial compensation, regardless of amount received, comprised potential COIs for two influential US medical journals. Further research is needed to explain why such high proportions of general payments were undisclosed and whether journals that rely on self-reported COI disclosure need to reconsider their policies.

Indexed as

Periodicals as TopicPhysiciansConflict of InterestCross-Sectional StudiesDisclosureHumansPublishingUnited StatesCLINICAL PHARMACOLOGYClinical trialsMEDICAL ETHICS

Identifiers

PMID35410932
PMCPMC9021780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.