Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35410825›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology oncology2023

Highly Sensitive and Specific Detection of Bladder Cancer via Targeted Ultra-deep Sequencing of Urinary DNA.

Douglas G Ward, Laura Baxter, Sascha Ott, Naheema S Gordon, Junhui Wang, Prashant Patel, Kim Piechocki, Lee Silcock, Chris Sale, Maurice P Zeegers and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European urology oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Image directed redesign of bladder cancer treatment pathways: the BladderPath RCT.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2024
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Advances in the management of localized bladder cancers.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Douglas G WardBladder Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Laura BaxterBioinformatics Research Technology Platform, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Sascha OttBioinformatics Research Technology Platform, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK; University of Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Naheema S GordonBladder Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Junhui WangUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Prashant PatelBladder Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Kim PiechockiNonacus Ltd., Birmingham Research Park, Birmingham, UK.
Lee SilcockNonacus Ltd., Birmingham Research Park, Birmingham, UK.
Chris SaleNonacus Ltd., Birmingham Research Park, Birmingham, UK.
Maurice P ZeegersCare and Public Health Research Institute, School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
K K ChengInstitute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Nicholas D JamesInstitute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Richard T BryanBladder Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. Electronic address: r.t.bryan@bham.ac.uk.
BladderPath Trial Management Group
University of Birmingham · GBBirmingham Research Park · GBUniversity of Warwick · GBInstitute of Cancer Research · GBMaastricht University · NLUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 25354Cancer Research UK C1343/A5738Cancer Research UK C16909/A23590Cancer Research UK RDSDIA-2022/100001Department of Health 14/08/60Medical Research Council MC_PC_18040Medical Research Council MC_PC_19029
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is an unmet need for an accurate, validated, noninvasive test for diagnosing and monitoring bladder cancer (BC). Detection of BC-associated mutations in urinary DNA via targeted deep sequencing could meet this need.

objectiveTo test the ability of mutational analysis of urinary DNA to noninvasively detect BC within the context of haematuria investigations and non-muscle-invasive BC (NMIBC) surveillance. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsCapture-based ultra-deep sequencing was performed for 443 somatic mutations in 23 genes in 591 urine cell-pellet DNAs from haematuria clinic patients and 293 from NMIBC surveillance patients. Variant calling was optimised to minimise false positives using urine samples from 162 haematuria clinic patients without BC. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The sensitivity and specificity for BC diagnosis were determined. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Mutational analysis of urinary DNA detected 144 of the 165 haematuria patients diagnosed with incident BC from two independent cohorts, yielding overall sensitivity of 87.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 81.2-92.0%) at specificity of 84.8% (95% CI 79.9-89.0%). The sensitivity was 97.4% for grade 3, 86.5% for grade 2, and 70.8% for grade 1 BC. Among NMIBC surveillance patients, 25 out of 29 recurrent BCs were detected, yielding sensitivity of 86.2% (95% CI 70.8-97.7%) at specificity of 62.5% (95% CI 56.1-68.0%); a positive urine mutation test in the absence of clinically detectable disease was associated with a 2.6-fold increase in the risk of future recurrence. The low number of recurrences in the NMIBC surveillance cohort and the lower sensitivity for detecting grade 1 pTa BC are limitations.

conclusionsDetection of mutations in a small panel of BC-associated genes could facilitate noninvasive BC testing and expedite haematuria investigations. Following further validation, the test could also play a role in NMIBC surveillance. PATIENT SUMMARY: Identification of alterations in genes that are frequently mutated in bladder cancer appears to be a promising strategy for detecting disease from urine samples and reducing reliance on examination of the bladder via a telescopic camera inserted through the urethra.

Indexed as

HematuriaUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsDNAHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansUrinary BladderDNABiomarkerBladder cancerDiagnosisDNAMutationSequencingUrine

Identifiers

PMID35410825
OpenAlexW4223542750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.