ArticleDiagnostic and interventional imaging2022
Comparison between 7 Tesla and 3 Tesla MRI for characterizing orbital lesions.
Article in Diagnostic and interventional imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- An explainable radiomics model based on multiparametric magnetic resonance for differentiating benign and malignant orbital tumors.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- Outcomes of malignant orbital tumors: a 22-year Norwegian single-center series.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Current Landscape of Short-T2 Imaging Techniques in the Musculoskeletal System: The Past, Present and Future.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025Review
- Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography at 5.0 T: quantitative and qualitative comparison with 3.0 T.BMC medical imaging · 2024Article
- Prevalence of Rathke Cleft and Other Incidental Pituitary Gland Findings on Contrast-Enhanced 3D Fat-Saturated T1 MPRAGE at 7T MRI.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2024Article
- Fully automated segmentation and volumetric measurement of ocular adnexal lymphoma by deep learning-based self-configuring nnU-net on multi-sequence MRI: a multi-center study.Neuroradiology · 2024Article
- Connexin 50 Influences the Physiological Optics of the In Vivo Mouse Lens.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024Article
- Diagnostic Performance of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced 3T MR Imaging for Characterization of Orbital Lesions: Validation in a Large Prospective Study.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2024Article
- From pixels to precision: Imaging technologies shaping oculofacial plastic surgery practice.Taiwan journal of ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeCharacterizing orbital lesions remains challenging with imaging. The purpose of this study was to compare 3 Tesla (T) to 7 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for characterizing orbital lesions. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis prospective single-center study enrolled participants presenting with orbital lesions from May to October 2019, who underwent both 7 T and 3 T MRI examinations. Two neuroradiologists, blinded to all data, read both datasets independently and randomly. They assessed general characteristics of each orbital lesion as well as image quality and presence of artifacts. Comparison between both datasets was made using Fisher exact test.
resultsSeven patients (4 women, 3 men) with a median age of 52 years were enrolled. Orbital lesion conspicuity was better scored at 7 T compared to 3 T MRI, with 3/7 lesions (43%) scored as very conspicuous at 7 T compared to 0/7 lesion (0%) at 3 T, although the difference was not significant (P = 0.16). Delineation of lesion margins was better scored at 7 T compared to 3 T with 3/7 lesions (43%) scored as very well delineated on 7 T compared to 0/7 lesions (0%) at 3 T, although the difference was not significant (P = 0.34). Details of internal structure were better assessed at 7 T compared to 3 T, with 4/7 lesions (57%) displaying numerous internal details compared to 0/7 lesions (0%) at 3 T (P = 0.10). Internal microvessels were visible in 3/7 lesions (43%) at 7 T compared to 0/7 lesions (0%) at 3 T (P = 0.19).
conclusionAlthough no significant differences were found between 7 T and 3 T MRI, assumably due to a limited number of patients, our study suggests that 7 Tesla MRI might help improve the characterization of orbital lesions. However, further studies with more patients are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.