Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35410780›Full record

ArticleJournal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation2024

Patient Satisfaction with Virtual vs In-Person Voice Therapy.

Raluca Gray, Deirdre Michael, Jesse Hoffmeister, Scott Lunos, Sarah Zach, Lisa Butcher, Dan Weinstein, Stephanie Misono

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Comparison of Voice Stimulability Testing in Telehealth and In-Person Formats.Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Tele-rehabilitation in voice disorders during the pandemic: a consensus paper from the French Society of Phoniatrics and Laryngology.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Raluca GrayDepartment of Otolaryngology, Lions Voice Clinic, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Electronic address: ralgray@umn.edu.
Deirdre MichaelDepartment of Otolaryngology, Lions Voice Clinic, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Jesse HoffmeisterDepartment of Otolaryngology, Lions Voice Clinic, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Scott LunosBiostatistical Design and Analysis Center, Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Sarah ZachDepartment of Otolaryngology, Lions Voice Clinic, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Lisa ButcherDepartment of Otolaryngology, Lions Voice Clinic, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Dan WeinsteinDepartment of Otolaryngology, Lions Voice Clinic, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Stephanie MisonoDepartment of Otolaryngology, Lions Voice Clinic, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
University of Minnesota · US

Funding

Psychological factors influencing voice outcomes: Technology-based assessment and interventionK23DC016335 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI MISONO, STEPHANIE · 2017 to 2021
$1.0M
NIDCD NIH HHS K23 DC016335
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine whether there is a difference in patient satisfaction between in-person and virtual voice therapy.

methodsPatient satisfaction answers to the National Research Corporation (NRC) Health patient survey were retrieved for two separate 11 month periods. The first was for an in-person cohort, from April 2019 to February 2020. The second was for a virtual cohort between April 2020 and February 2021. Two group t tests or Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to compare responses between the in-person and virtual cohorts. The effect of modality of therapy by gender, age, and race was examined by testing interactions with separate ANOVA models.

resultsResponses were compared between 224 patient satisfaction surveys for the virtual cohort and 309 patient satisfaction surveys for the in-person cohort. Overall, responses were highly favorable in all categories. There were no differences between the in-person and virtual cohorts' responses with respect to three main categories: likelihood of future referral of clinic or provider; communication with provider; and comprehension of the treatment plan. The interaction between modality of therapy delivery and age was significant for the question, "Did you know what to do after your visit," with 18-44 year olds in the in-person group reporting a better understanding of the treatment plan compared to the 18-44 year olds in the virtual therapy cohort (P = 0.004). There were no interactions between modality of therapy and gender, or race.

conclusionVirtual delivery of voice therapy was associated with comparable visit satisfaction scores to in-person delivery, with both delivery modalities demonstrating very high satisfaction. Future studies are needed to identify which patients and conditions are most suited for virtual versus in-person delivery of speech-language pathology services in voice clinics.

Indexed as

Patient SatisfactionVoice QualityVoice TrainingAdolescentAdultAgedAge FactorsFemaleHealth Care SurveysHumansMaleMiddle AgedTelemedicineTreatment OutcomeVoice DisordersYoung AdultTelemedicine—Virtual voice therapy—Patient satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID35410780
PMCPMC13045751
OpenAlexW4223520333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.