Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35410427›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2022

Characteristics of patients who received helicopter emergency medical services in Japan from 2012 to 2019: a retrospective analysis of data from Tochigi Prefecture.

Koji Wake, Takafumi Noguchi, Hidekazu Hishinuma, Masayoshi Zaitsu, Jin Kikuchi, Masatoshi Uchida, Kentaro Hayashi, Masanari Machida, Hajime Houzumi, Eisei Hoshiyama and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Helicopter Ambulance Transport to the Emergency Department: Demographic and Clinical Factors Impacting Outcomes in a Turkish Medical Center.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Koji Wake *Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Dokkyo Medical University, Shimotsuga-gun, Tochigi, Japan. wake@dokkyomed.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3375-3159
Takafumi Noguchi *Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, Dokkyo Medical University, Shimotsuga-gun, Tochigi, Japan.
Hidekazu HishinumaDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Dokkyo Medical University, Shimotsuga-gun, Tochigi, Japan.
Masayoshi ZaitsuDepartment of Public Health, School of Medicine, Dokkyo Medical University, Shimotsuga-gun, Tochigi, Japan. m-zaitsu@dokkyomed.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7616-355X
Jin KikuchiDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Dokkyo Medical University, Shimotsuga-gun, Tochigi, Japan.
Masatoshi UchidaDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Dokkyo Medical University, Shimotsuga-gun, Tochigi, Japan.
Kentaro HayashiDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Dokkyo Medical University, Shimotsuga-gun, Tochigi, Japan.
Masanari MachidaDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Dokkyo Medical University, Shimotsuga-gun, Tochigi, Japan.
Hajime HouzumiDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Dokkyo Medical University, Shimotsuga-gun, Tochigi, Japan.
Eisei HoshiyamaDepartment of Neurology, Dokkyo Medical University, Shimotsuga-gun, Tochigi, Japan.
Kyo TakahashiDepartment of Public Health, School of Medicine, Dokkyo Medical University, Shimotsuga-gun, Tochigi, Japan.
Gen KobashiDepartment of Public Health, School of Medicine, Dokkyo Medical University, Shimotsuga-gun, Tochigi, Japan.
Kazuyuki OnoDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Dokkyo Medical University, Shimotsuga-gun, Tochigi, Japan.
Dokkyo Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHelicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS) has been in operation in Japan since 2001, allowing patients almost anywhere in the nation to receive on-scene emergency treatment from physicians. However, there is insufficient literature on the characteristics of the patients who use Japanese HEMS. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the overall characteristics of patients receiving HEMS care within a single prefecture in Japan.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed the data of 5163 patients-in Tochigi Prefecture-who received HEMS care from 2012 to 2019. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the following aspects of care: diagnosis, severity, background characteristics, geographical and environmental variables, immediate pre-hospital intervention, transportation type, and short-term clinical outcomes.

resultsAmong 7370 HEMS requests received during the study period, treatment was provided to 5163 patients (1.8 cases per day; 3489 men [67.6%]). Nearly 55% (n = 2856) of patients were aged above 60 years. Age peaks were observed at 0-9 years and 60-69 years. The median distance from the base hospital to the site was 26.7 km. The age-standardized rate of HEMS treatment was 30.3 patients per 100,000 people. Cases of trauma and cardiovascular diseases were the most common (65.3%). Most individuals aged 0-9 years and 60-69 years had neurological disease (seizures accounted for 80.5% of this group) and cardiovascular disease, respectively. The number of patients was similar across all four seasons. After immediate pre-hospital intervention, 81.6% of patients receiving HEMS care were transferred by the helicopter ambulance (53.4% and 28.2% to the base hospital and to other hospitals, respectively). Overall, 56.6% of patients receiving HEMS care were transferred to the base hospital, and the short-term recovery rate was above 75%. Intravenous drip and oxygen administration were the most common pre-hospital interventions (93.1% and 72.7%, respectively).

conclusionsThis study is the first to describe the overall characteristics of HEMS patients using comprehensive data of all HEMS patients in one prefecture in Japan. Further research using both local- and national-level data is needed to accelerate the understanding of the benefits of HEMS.

Indexed as

Air AmbulancesEmergency Medical ServicesAircraftHumansJapanMaleRetrospective StudiesAmbulanceDoctor-HeliHelicopter emergency medical servicesPre-hospital intervention

Identifiers

PMID35410427
PMCPMC8996593
OpenAlexW4223465280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.