Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35410336›Full record

ArticleHuman resources for health2022

Leadership, politics, and communication: challenges of the epidemiology workforce during emergency response.

Amy Elizabeth Parry, Martyn D Kirk, Samantha Colquhoun, David N Durrheim, Tambri Housen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human resources for health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Field Epidemiology: Fit for the future.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amy Elizabeth ParryNational Centre for Epidemiology & Population Health (NCEPH), Acton, ACT, The Australian National University (ANU), Building 62 Mills Road, Canberra, Australia. amy.parry@anu.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-6641-7149
Martyn D KirkNational Centre for Epidemiology & Population Health (NCEPH), Acton, ACT, The Australian National University (ANU), Building 62 Mills Road, Canberra, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5432-5984
Samantha ColquhounNational Centre for Epidemiology & Population Health (NCEPH), Acton, ACT, The Australian National University (ANU), Building 62 Mills Road, Canberra, Australia.
David N DurrheimUniversity of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9236-4861
Tambri HousenNational Centre for Epidemiology & Population Health (NCEPH), Acton, ACT, The Australian National University (ANU), Building 62 Mills Road, Canberra, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4569-7601

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImproving the epidemiological response to emergencies requires an understanding of who the responders are, their role and skills, and the challenges they face during responses. In this paper, we explore the role of the epidemiologist and identify challenges they face during emergency response.

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional survey to learn more about epidemiologists who respond to public health emergencies. The online survey included open and closed-ended questions on challenges faced while responding, the roles of epidemiology responders, self-rating of skills, and support needed and received. We used purposive sampling to identify participants and a snowballing approach thereafter. We compared data by a number of characteristics, including national or international responder on their last response prior to the survey. We analysed the data using descriptive, content, and exploratory factor analysis.

resultsWe received 166 responses from individuals with experience in emergency response. The most frequently reported challenge was navigating the political dynamics of a response, which was more common for international responders than national. National responders experienced fewer challenges related to culture, language, and communication. Epidemiology responders reported a lack of response role clarity, limited knowledge sharing, and communication issues during emergency response. Sixty-seven percent of participants reported they needed support to do their job well; males who requested support were statistically more likely to receive it than females who asked.

conclusionsOur study identified that national responders have additional strengths, such as better understanding of the local political environment, language, and culture, which may in turn support identification of local needs and priorities. Although this research was conducted prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, the results are even more relevant now. This research builds on emerging evidence on how to strengthen public health emergency response and provides a platform to begin a global conversation to address operational issues and the role of the international epidemiology responder.

Indexed as

COVID-19LeadershipCommunicationCross-Sectional StudiesEmergenciesFemaleHumansMalePandemicsPoliticsWorkforceCommunicationEmergencyEpidemiologyHealth workforceLeadershipPublic health practice

Identifiers

PMID35410336
PMCPMC8995686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.