Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35410322›Full record

Trial reportBMC pediatrics2022

Panic or peace - prioritising infant welfare when medicating feverish infants: a grounded theory study of adherence in a paediatric clinical trial.

Eunicia Tan, Karen Hoare, Judith Riley, Kathryn Fernando, Libby Haskell, Christopher Jd McKinlay, Stuart R Dalziel, Irene Braithwaite

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Eunicia TanDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. eunicia.tan@middlemore.co.nz.
Karen HoareSchool of Nursing, Massey University, Auckland, New Zealand.
Judith RileyMedical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.
Kathryn FernandoMedical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.
Libby HaskellChildren's Emergency Department, Starship Children's Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
Christopher Jd McKinlayLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Stuart R DalzielDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Irene BraithwaiteMedical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.
Medical Research Institute of New Zealand · NZUniversity of Auckland · NZMassey University · NZStarship Children's Health · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLiterature on factors influencing medication adherence within paediatric clinical trials is sparse. The Paracetamol and Ibuprofen in the Primary Prevention of Asthma in Tamariki (PIPPA Tamariki) trial is an open-label, randomised controlled trial aiming to determine whether paracetamol treatment, compared with ibuprofen treatment, as required for fever and pain in the first year of life, increases the risk of asthma at age six years. To inform strategies for reducing trial medication crossovers, understanding factors influencing the observed ibuprofen-to-paracetamol crossovers (non-protocol adherence) is vital. The aim of this study was to investigate the factors influencing the decision-making process when administering or prescribing ibuprofen to infants that may contribute to the crossover events in the PIPPA Tamariki trial.

methodsConstructivist grounded theory methods were employed. We conducted semi-structured interviews of caregivers of enrolled PIPPA Tamariki infants and healthcare professionals in various healthcare settings. Increasing theoretical sensitivity of the interviewers led to theoretical sampling of participants who could expand on the teams' early constructed codes. Transcribed interviews were coded and analysed using the constant comparative method of concurrent data collection and analysis.

resultsBetween September and December 2020, 20 participants (12 caregivers; 8 healthcare professionals) were interviewed. We constructed a grounded theory of prioritising infant welfare that represents a basic social process when caregivers and healthcare professionals medicate feverish infants. This process comprises three categories: historical, trusting relationships and being discerning; and is modified by one condition: being conflicted. Participants bring with them historical ideas. Trusting relationships with researchers, treating clinicians and family play a central role in enabling participants to challenge historical ideas and be discerning. Trial medication crossovers occur when participants become conflicted, and they revert to historical practices that feel familiar and safer.

conclusionsWe identified factors and a basic social process influencing ibuprofen use in infants and trial medication crossover events, which can inform strategies for promoting adherence in the PIPPA Tamariki trial. Future studies should explore the role of trusting relationships between researchers and treating clinicians when conducting research.

Indexed as

AsthmaIbuprofenAcetaminophenFeverGrounded TheoryHumansInfantInfant WelfareAcetaminophenIbuprofenConstructivist grounded theoryCOVID-19Fever phobiaIbuprofenPaediatricParacetamolTrial adherenceTrust

Identifiers

PMID35410322
PMCPMC8995914
OpenAlexW4223598130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.